Meeting documents

Venue: The Paralympic Room - AVDC. View directions

Contact: Craig Saunders; Email: csaunders@aylesburyvaledc.gov.uk; 

Items
No. Item

1.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 87 KB

To approve as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on 20 September 2016, copy attached as Appendix A.

Minutes:

RESOLVED –

 

That the minutes of the meeting held on 20 September 2016 be approved as a correct record.

2.

Declarations of Interest

Members to declare any interests.

 

Minutes:

Councillor Lambert declared a personal interest in Agenda Item number 6 (Update on Flooding on the Willows development) as the Buckinghamshire County Councillor for the Aylesbury West ward which covered the Willows development.

3.

Ecology update 2016 pdf icon PDF 51 KB

To consider the attached report.

 

Contact Officer: Paul Holton 01296 585947

Minutes:

The Committee received a report which provided information and an update on the changes since the 2015 report. The report highlighted species which were protected, in need of management and at risk of decline, and showed how the council was managing protected species, and how AVDC policy is enabling habitat conservation.

 

The report set out the key areas of work that the AVDC Ecologist delivered to meet the growth agenda, health and well-being, and community engagement objectives. It set out how the council protected species and habitats through the planning process to ensure no net loss and where possible net gains to biodiversity in accordance with National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The report also discussed how species and habitats are further enhanced and protected through the various partnership projects that exist through the support of the Ecologist.

 

The Committee heard that since 2015 one Ecologist had been responsible is for providing advice regarding all planning applications that had an impact on ecology. These applications varied between a two storey extension to major developments and infrastructure projects such as HS2. The AVDC Ecologist reviewed nearly 1,000 planning applications every year. The Ecologist also provided guidance on policy to ensure the Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan provided protection for nature across the Vale.

 

Of particular note was the success in the negotiation and design of the Kingsbrook development. The developer, Barratts, was working with Officers and the RSPB towards biodiversity enhancement. Kingsbrook was expected to be a new benchmark for housing development in this respect. The ecological measures at Kingsbrook include:

 

           120 hectares wetland nature reserve created managed by the RSBP

           A substantial visitor centre managed by RSPB servicing the nature reserve

           A national Black Poplar trail

           Native trees throughout the development

           Integrated bat and bird boxes in all appropriate buildings

           70% of the development will be green space primarily managed for nature

           conservation

           A Sand Martin bank

           Over 50 new ponds

           Biodiversity Acton Plan priority habitat created throughout

           Ground breaking Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems designed to be functional and benefit biodiversity

           Fruit trees in over 50% of the gardens

           Fencing designed to be permeable to wildlife

           Wildlife crossings under roads

           Gardens designed to be wildlife friendly

 

The Committee was informed that volunteer support played a key role with the AVDC Ecologist, generating 2,800 volunteer days in 2015. These groups carried out practical conservation work, biological surveys, and liaised with landowners and scientific studies. The groups were relatively independent but relied on support and guidance from the Ecologist. The volunteers had also undertaken conservation management through planting wildflower meadows, hedges and trees as well as hedge laying. These benefitted the environment, as well as users and passers-by. In addition, these were services that AVDC would otherwise have to pay for. Recent projects included Riverside Walk and The Coppice.

 

Members sought further information from the AVDC Ecologist and were informed:-

 

(i)         the number of bird  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.

4.

Update on flooding on the Willows Development pdf icon PDF 24 KB

To consider the attached report.

 

Contact Officer: Adam Heeley 01296 585459

Minutes:

The Committee received a report which provided an update on the actions taken since the flooding on The Willows Estate during February 2014.

 

A Repair and Renewal Grant of a maximum of £5,000 per homeowner that suffered from internal flooding was provided. The grant was to be put towards improving the flood resilience of each home. From this fund, £500 could be put towards studies and floor risk reports. This meant that out of 80 households, £40,000 could potentially have been available for AVDC to carry out feasibility work. AVDC had approached partner authorities (Buckinghamshire County Council, Environment Agency, Transport for Buckinghamshire, and Thames Water Utilities Limited) on 9 June 2014 to ask if they would work cooperatively towards the studies. Out of 80 households, 67 agreed to the feasibility study which led to £33,500 being pooled together from the RRG fund.

 

Hydro Consultancy carried out the study and constructed computer simulated flooding scenarios. From this model, three options had been proposed to help reduce the flood risk at The Willows Estate. The cost of this model and report was £12,250. Additionally, Hydro Consultancy had been asked asked to provide and develop a long term flood alleviation scheme to preliminary design stage at an additional cost of £2,750.

 

For the model to be accurate, additional topographical survey data were required. This had been carried out by Global Surveys and they had completed the work in week commencing 20 January 2015. The cost of the survey was £4,650.

 

The final report provided three options:

 

           Temporary defences

           Temporary defences with some capital works

           A long term capital scheme

 

The Committee was informed that temporary defences were chosen in order to maximise the RRG funds. The defences were currently stored at a Transport for Bucks site and would only be deployed when heavy rainfall is predicted together with a raised water level in the brook. When a formal warning was released, AVDC, EA, Bucks CC, as well as the residents group, would be alerted via text and email.

 

To help promote the temporary defences and to show how the resident’s grant had been spent, a launch event had been carried out on 12 September 2015. The event had also sought to explain how the defences work and the ease with which they could be deployed. The event had been well attended by nearly 100 residents.

 

The report highlighted the importance of corporative work between Bucks CC, TfB, Willows Residents Flood Group, EA, Bucks & Milton Keynes Fire and Rescue Service, and Bucks Off Road Group. The report also commended the support and assistance provided from Councillors at AVDC and Bucks CC.

 

The Committee was also informed of the on-going concern of rubbish and other material being dumped into the brook upstream and causing problems when it builds up. AVDC acted to remove rubbish when it was reported, however a more efficient method would be the prevention of rubbish being dumped in the first place.

 

Members sought further information and were  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.

5.

Enforcement update pdf icon PDF 225 KB

To consider the attached report.

 

Contact Officer: Susan Kitchen 01296 585436

Minutes:

The Committee received a report on planning infrastructure to assist members in their understanding. The report contained information on:

 

           The nature of enforcement work

           The basis upon which formal action could be taken

           Justifications that had to be shown in order to take action

           The different stages in the enforcement process

 

Members sought further information and were informed that:-

 

(i)         the Planning Enforcement team had not been fully resourced over the last year due to one employee being on long-term sick leave who had then left the council.  Whilst consultants had been utilised, there was still a vacancy post. Enforcement had been maximising use of their resources through the introduction of a web form where people could submit a lot of information, along with photographic evidence, to AVDC. This had minimalised the number of site visits required and, in some cases, had led to quick case closures.

 

(ii)        site visits were still undertaken when necessary as an online complaint may need further validation, for instance in the case of untidy land.

 

(iii)       some of the terminology in the Planning Enforcement Plan was intentionally broad

 

(iv)       there was little demand for an out of hours service as breaches mostly occurred during working hours. There was a level of cover provided during Bank Holiday weekends 

 

(v)       drone usage had been considered had also been used by other authorities. There might be scope to utilise this in future once the legal aspects had been addressed

 

(vi)       not all issues might be reported to AVDC so communication from Members when they become aware of a complaint was important

 

(vii)      the council kept a register of protected trees that could be checked on the AVDC website

 

(viii)     when a breach had been reported then all the available information was assessed to decide whether undertaking formal action was in the public interest

 

(ix)       case costs were not always tangible at the outset when a possible planning enforcement matter was reported

 

Members also commented:-

 

           the council’s authority as a third party was appreciated by constituents as they could negotiate and resolve complaints raised.

 

           that they appreciate passing on any residents’ concerns regarding Planning if and when they arise.

 

RESOLVED –

 

The contents of the report and the Enforcement Plan be noted. 

6.

Services provided by the Community Spaces Team pdf icon PDF 90 KB

To consider the attached report.

 

Contact Officer:  Gareth Bird (01296) 585228

Minutes:

The Committee received a report on the services provided by the Community Spaces Team. The services provided by the team include the following:

 

           Procure, manage, monitor, and administer contracts covering; horticulture and street cleaning operations, public conveniences cleaning, public health funerals, and parks improvements

           Identify and deliver improvement projects in parks and open spaces

           Secure external funding to enable the delivery of improvement projects

           Provide safe and good quality play provision

           Develop partnerships with suppliers, community groups, and statutory bodies

           Manage and monitor developer S106 leisure contributions

           Develop and maintain sports pitches and related facilities including booking service

           Investigate instances of fly tipping and enforce fly tipping laws in liaison with the Waste Partnership for Bucks

           Investigate reports of abandoned vehicles and arrange for disposal

           Manage and deliver the public health funerals service

           Fulfil customer enquiries including service requests, compliments, complaints, and comments.

 

The services provided had been done during a time of staffing structure change due to the Heritage Team Leader post becoming vacant. 12 months ago, the Green Spaces Team had been realigned across the organisation which had led some redundancies. The management of trees on AVDC land and the strategic management of AVDC parks had transferred to the Community Spaces Team. Work related to commenting on planning applications and S106 negotiations for leisure infrastructure had also transferred to the CST, with no additional posts created to cover this work.

 

The team had achieved a seven year contract saving of £1.4m through procuring a single contract to provide a horticulture and street cleaning service in the district as opposed to the two previous separate contracts for these services. Similarly, a dog waste service had been incorporated into the work done by horticulture and street cleaning contract rather than having a separate contract. Other achievements include:

 

           Positive outcome from an internal audit regarding our management of the Street Cleansing and Horticulture Contract, including monitoring of work and financial controls.

           Working differently to reduce staff number from 13 to 7 employees. This had meant some functions such as the Vale Park warden service had stopped, although with minimal impact given the site had a presence through PCSOs and Aqua Vale Leisure Centre, combined with changes to make the site safer.

           Horticulture services provided to Buckinghamshire Fire Brigade via our Street Cleaning and Horticulture Contract; providing another public body with savings compared to their previous arrangements.

           Green Flag awards for Vale and Bedgrove Parks had been secured.

           The subsidy of pitch provision for football had been reduced by closely monitoring demand to ensure each pitch was fully utilised.

           The outcome of a RoSPA access and play value audit confirmed all sites had a minimum play rating of good.

           Management plans for closed churchyard that AVDC were responsible for had been produced with excellent stakeholder involvement and had been published on the website. Linked to this, a programme for memorial testing was now in  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6.

7.

Work Programme

To consider the future work programme. Meetings are scheduled as follows:-

 

·                    20 December 2016 (Community Safety Update / Strategy 2017-20, Leisure Facilities in the Vale, Energy Policy & Usage, Waste & Recycling Update).

 

·                    15 February 2017 (VAHT Annual Updates, Pay to Stay).

 

Contact Officer: Craig Saunders (01296) 585043

Minutes:

The Committee considered their future work programme as submitted to the meeting.

 

RESOLVED –

 

That the current work programme be noted.