Meeting documents
Venue: Council Chamber, King George V House, King George V Road, Amersham
Contact: Mathew Bloxham 01494 732143; email: mbloxham@chiltern.gov.uk
No. | Item | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To sign the Minutes of the meeting held on 13 December 2016 Minutes: The
Minutes of the Cabinet meeting held 13 December 2016 were approved and signed
by Councillor I Darby, Cabinet Leader, as a correct record. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest Minutes: There were
no declarations of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minutes: The
Cabinet received a report attaching the draft 28-Day Notices for the Cabinet
meeting on 4 April and the Chiltern & South Bucks Joint Committee on 11
April. RESOLVED - That the Draft 28-Day
Notices be noted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Issues Minutes: (i)
Councillor G Harris - Youth Awards
2017 Councillor
Harris reported that the Council had received 96 nominations for this year’s
Youth Awards. The nominations would be considered later this week, and the
awards would be presented at a ceremony on 16 March at the Kings Church,
Amersham. The Lord Lieutenant of Buckinghamshire would be present. (ii)
Councillor P Martin - Housing White
Paper: “Fixing our broken housing market” A Housing
White Paper had just been published which set out how the Government intended
to boost housing supply and create a more efficient housing market. Councillor
Martin provided the following summary of the key proposals set out in the
document, and advised that a full assessment would be available in due course: ·
250,000
extra homes per annum were required ·
Councils
will be required to produce an up-to-date plan on housing delivery ·
There
will be rolling targets on housing delivery ·
Shortening
default timescales for developers to implement permissions for housing
development from three years to two years ·
A
Home Building Fund to support small and medium sized builders ·
Encouraging
offsite construction and greater innovation in building methods ·
Introduction
of the Lifetime ISA ·
Maintain
protections for Green Belt land with boundaries being amended only in
exceptional circumstances ·
Helping
older residents move at the right time to improve their quality of life and
free up housing for other buyers Councillor
I Darby felt that the White Paper didn’t go far enough to address housing
issues, and that the proposed reduction in default time for implementing
permissions was too weak. It was felt that much more could be done, for example
by allowing Councils to charge Council Tax on properties earlier following
planning permission being obtained. Councillor
P Jones was invited to speak and suggested that the announcements were not good
news for local government due to the suggestion that Council finances may be
cut if higher numbers of housing were not delivered. Councillor I Darby - Modernising
Local Government Councillor
Darby provided an update on the positive discussions at a meeting between the
leaders of the four District Councils in Buckinghamshire and the Secretary of
State for Communities and Local Government regarding the District Councils’
submission on modernising local government in Buckinghamshire. The Secretary of
State had received two submissions, one from the County Council, and one from
the four Districts. An announcement from the Secretary for State regarding his “minded
to” decision was expected by the end of March. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue Budget 2017/2018 PDF 77 KB Minutes: The Cabinet received a report setting out the proposed Revenue Budget for 2017/18, which would form the basis for setting the Council’s proportion of Council Tax, being recommended for approval by the Council. Whilst considering the report, the Cabinet noted that the Resources Overview Committee had considered the report at the meeting held on 31 January and were supportive of the recommendations. The Support Services Policy Advisory Group had also discussed the revenue budget and in particular how the surplus within the budget for 2017/18 should be deployed across the Council’s earmarked reserves. The report’s key points were then outlined as follows: · The Council’s finance settlement, the funding received from the Government, was as expected. · There would also be a reduction in Council income from investments due to low interest rates and use of reserves to support capital expenditure and key projects. · There were changes to the New Homes Bonus. · The proposed budget was based on a 2.9% increase in District Council Tax which amounted to a £5 increase for a Band D property. · There would be a revenue surplus of £1.2M in 2017/18. · The Medium Term Financial Strategy showed that the Council was taking a more cautious view on funding due to the likely reduction in funding from Government after 2019/20. · The advice from the Section 151 (Chief Finance) Officer was noted which showed the budget had been properly prepared, financial risks identified and how they would be managed and that the Council would be comfortably above the prudent minimum level of reserves. During consideration of the report the Cabinet noted the other options available to the Council: 1. That there be no increase in the Council’s element of Council Tax which would result in less resource being available to fund the capital programme and funding gap in future years. 2. That the Council increase its element on Council Tax by more than the referendum threshold of 2% (£5 for a band D property), considered unrealistic, due to the risk that electors do not support the increase and the cost of holding a referendum. During the discussion, the rate at which the Council’s level of Government funding would be reduced to zero was highlighted. The rate of change was particularly high for 2016/17 which had represented a 29% reduction. The Council was therefore praised for its financial management. The Council had worked very hard over the past five years to produce financial savings and defer the point at which significant additional savings were required despite the substantial reduction in funding from the Government. Thanks were expressed to Heads of Service in particular for their work in relation to the budget setting process. The Council had developed a proven method of managing the budget, and should be proud of the way that the Council’s finances had been managed. The Cabinet then
|