Meeting documents
Venue: Cabinet Room, Council Offices, King George V Road, Amersham
Contact: Democratic Services Email: chiefexecs@chiltern.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes To sign the Minutes of the meetings held on 9 July 2010, circulated separately. Minutes: The minutes of the
meeting held on 9 July 2010, copies of which had been circulated previously,
were agreed and signed by the Chairman. |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
Performance Related Pay Scheme: Update PDF 23 KB Minutes: Councillor Rose
referred to the report that had been considered at the meeting of Personnel
Committee on 28 July 2010 and proceeded to explain the discussion that had
taken place at this meeting. The Personnel
Committee had been made aware that the proposal to scrap the PRP had created a lot of bad feeling amongst the staff whom
the Council needed to take with them if the difficult challenges that lay ahead
are to be met. The Personnel Committee had also been made aware that the discussions at the CDCJSC had to date been conducted in a vacuum. Councillor Rose
went on to explain that in order for future negotiations to be conducted in a
more constructive and meaningful way he had requested the Personnel Committee
to provide a steer on the options. In providing this steer, the Personnel
Committee had agreed: ·
that
the PRP Scheme should be retained as a mechanism for carrying out appraisals; ·
that
the Scheme so retained should have a provision to make payments; ·
that
mindful of the Coalition Government’s wish for there to be no pay increase for
staff in the public sector the 2%
increase in pay as set out in the hybrid options should be disregarded and not
be a subject for negotiation; ·
that the
negotiations should be progressed within the budget indicated and on the basis
of option6c(ii) Roman numeral 111 but with the band
for “Satisfactory†removed. Councillor Rose
felt that the package now on offer represented a reasonable compromise given
the financial situation and the need to find savings as discussed at previous
meetings. During the
discussion that ensued the Staff Side pointed out that
with the budget for the PRP being cut by 50% and with
no provision for an increase in basic pay at a time when inflation was running
at over 3% the package still represented a cut in pay for staff. At 10.35 am the
meeting adjourned to enable the Staff Side to consider the package now on
offer. The meeting
reconvened at 10.55 with In response to a question from Alan Goodrum, Alan Whichelow said he was unsure at this stage the format the consultation would take. Nor could he give a timetable for completing the consultation, mindful of the need to engage all staff, many of whom would be on holiday during August. |