Meeting documents

2001/36/TC

Case Officer:      Keith Musgrave

Date Received:     13/07/01     Decide by Date:     24/08/01

Parish:     Chesham Bois     Ward:     Chesham Bois & Weedon

App Type:     Work to unpreserved trees in Conservation Area

Applicant:      MISS E NIMMO

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Chesham Bois Conservation Area

Established Residential Area of Special Character - Local Plan Policy H4

Unclassified road

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

96/0030/TC     Crown reduction by 25-30% of Eucalyptus tree. No TPO made.

THE APPLICATION

Major pruning/possible felling of Eucalyptus tree.

PARISH COUNCIL

The Parish Council has no objection to the treework in the Conservation Area.

REPRESENTATIONS

Applicant:     Reason for work is structural damage to adjacent property.

CONSULTATIONS

District Forestry and Landscape Adviser:     Large Eucalyptus in rear garden of property close to two dwellings – reduced under 96/0030/TC – significant re-growth of about 6m resulting in coarse crown with branches touching building – access to base of tree not possible but roots previously reported as raising paving slabs in 1996.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan – 1997: Policy CA5 

ISSUES

1.     The Eucalyptus tree is situated in the rear garden of the property but it is partially visible from Bois Lane and Chesham Bois Common.

2.     The tree is close to the rear of two properties and has coarse branching touching the buildings.  The tree is obviously causing problems because of its position and the applicant states that the tree is causing structural damage to the adjacent property.  In these circumstances it is considered that a Tree Preservation Order would not be appropriate.

3.     It is considered that it would not be appropriate to request replacement planting.

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: That a TPO shall not be made; no replacements requested

2001/1101/CH

Case Officer:      Andrew Fuller

Date Received:     29/06/01     Decide by Date:     23/08/01

Parish:     Chalfont St Peter     Ward:     Austenwood

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS J JACOBSON

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Chalfont St Peter-Firs Estate Conservation Area

Established Residential Area of Special Character - Local Plan Policy H4

Unclassified road

Mineral Consultation Area

Northolt Airfield safeguarding zone

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

01/0031/TC   Felling of a laburnum, a crab apple and a cherry within the conservation area.

01/0032/TC   Felling of two ash trees two laburnums, a crab apple and a hawthorn, all within the conservation area.

THE APPLICATION

A single-storey side extension 3m wide and 4.5m deep. The structure is flush with the rear elevation of the property and is capped by a fake-hipped roof to 3.7m above ground level.

PARISH COUNCIL

No objection.

REPRESENTATIONS

One letter from neighbouring residents raising no objections.

POLICIES

The Adopted Buckinghamshire County Structure Plan 1991 – 2011 Policies GC1, H4, H13, H14, H15, H17, TR11, TR16 and CA1.

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC3.

ISSUES

1.     The application is for a relatively small scale structure to the side of a property in the ‘Firs Estate’ conservation area, also forming part of the wider Austenwood Established Residential area of Special Character. The position of the detached double garage is directly in front of the proposal with side gates across to the house to provide an effective screen to the new build from the street scene. Currently to the side/rear of the garage is an outbuilding running along the boundary, forming a courtyard with the garage and house. The proposal includes the demolition of this structure so as to expose the extension to the side access road leading to ‘Dell cottage’. With the remarking of this boundary by planting of suitable hedging will effectively hide the new build from any public viewpoint in the conservation area in which it sits. As such the proposal is considered not adverse in relation to Local Plan Policy GC1, H4, H15 and CA1, and the design and scale of the structure to have been positioned so as to preserve the special character of this unique turn of the century arts and crafts environment.

2.     The structure will not be visible to any neighbours from the rear, side or front and as such is not considered to compromise the amenity currently enjoyed by neighbours of their property. Local Plan Policy GC3, H13 and H14 are considered adhered to.

3.     The detached double breadth forecourt leading to double garage is satisfactory in terms of Local Plan parking standards.

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

2001/1119/CH

Case Officer:      Geoffrey Hugall

Date Received:     02/07/01     Decide by Date:     26/08/01

Parish:     Amersham     Ward:     Amersham the Hill

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS GARMON JONES

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

THE APPLICATION

The proposed extension would be 3.9m deep, (although only 1.8m of the proposal would project beyond the main rear elevation of the dwelling), and a width of up to 3.6m.  The part of the proposal that projects beyond the rear elevation takes the form of a conservatory whereas the infilling part is to be brick built.  The roof of the main dwelling is to be extended down and across the brick part of the extension, a rooflight and a high-level window are to be installed in that elevation.  The conservatory part has maximum height of 3.5m.

TOWN COUNCIL

Recommend approve.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC2, GC3, H13, H14, H15, H17, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The design of the extension is considered to respect the scale and proportions of the dwelling and would not result in the overdevelopment of the plot.  As the proposal is at the rear of the dwelling no adverse impact upon the street scene would result.  No objections under Polices GC1, H13, H15 and H17.

2.     The proposal would only impact upon the amenities of the neighbour at No.10.  However given the minimal nature of the proposed work it is not considered that there would be any significant loss of light and the proposal would not appear too overbearing.  The high-level window in the flank elevation facing no.10 could potentially permit some extra overlooking, however, given the 1.8m high fence and the height of the window cill it is not considered that any significant loss of amenity would occur.  As such, no objections are raised under Polices GC2, GC3, H13 and H14.

3.     No objections are raised under Policies TR11 and TR16, adequate car parking on site is provided in the form of a double garage and the forecourt..

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

2001/1120/CH

Case Officer:      Andrew Fuller

Date Received:     02/07/01     Decide by Date:     26/08/01

Parish:     Chalfont St Peter     Ward:     Chalfont Common

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS P DODD

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

Site within 250 m. of active or disused rubbish tip

Mineral Consultation Area

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

99/0181/CH   Single storey side extension.   Conditional permission.

THE APPLICATION

A single storey extension to the rear left-hand side of the property. The structure will form a hexagonal bay 4.7m wide and 3.5m deep with a hipped roof to 3.6m (capped by a flat roof).

PARISH COUNCIL

No objection.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997: Policies GC1, H13, H14, H15, H17, TR11 and TR16.

Proposed Alterations to the Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan 1997 - Deposit Copy - July 1998 (including Proposed Modifications- November 2000): Policies GC3.

ISSUES

1.     The application for this relatively small-scale structure will appear in keeping with this already well extended property, without generating an overdeveloped appearance. Furthermore the new build will not be witnessed from any public viewpoint in the built up area of Chalfont St. Peter. No objections under Policy GC1 and H15.

2.     The rear garden of this property is appropriately planted along all boundaries with mature and dense trees and hedging. As such no neighbouring property can gain view into the garden, particularly of the structure. Issues of amenity under Local Plan Policy GC3, H13 and H14 are not raised.

3.     The ample off street parking spaces housed in the integral double garage and wide forecourt leading down to it, accommodate the necessary parking to comply with TR11 and TR16 of the Local Plan.

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

2001/1123/CH

Case Officer:      Geoffrey Hugall

Date Received:     02/07/01     Decide by Date:     26/08/01

Parish:     Chalfont St Peter     Ward:     Chalfont Common

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR I REED

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

Mineral Consultation Area

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

CH/2047/82     Replacement garage, approved.

(Neighbouring plot, The Holt, has planning permission to demolish the existing bungalow and erect three detached dwellings in its place).

THE APPLICATION

The proposal is to extend the bungalow to form a two-storey dwelling.  The resultant structure would have maximum dimensions of 9.8m in depth by 8.8m in width.  Its eaves height would be approximately 3.8m in height with the main ridge at 7.3m.  The roof would have gable ends on the front and rear elevations (south-east and north-west).  The proposal would include a smaller gable at first floor level in the south-western elevation and two smaller gables on the north-eastern side elevation.  For reference the existing bungalow has an area of 6.8m by 9.8, an eaves of 2.5m with a ridge at 5.5m.  The plans indicate that all the new external brickwork and rendering is to match the existing with the new roof tiles to be agreed.

PARISH COUNCIL

No objection.

REPRESENTATIONS

Letter on behalf of the neighbour at ‘The Holt’ –

1.     This proposed redevelopment brings the extended property nearer to the boundary with the new house (Plot 3) that is due to be built for us.  This gives a full height side wall overlooking our kitchen and bathroom.  According to the plans there will be a large landing window in the middle of this wall at a level above any party wall or fence.

2.     The extension is proposed to be built in the same bricks as the original which I understand to be in sand faced flettons, therefore as there will be a large expanse of wall this will make the building ugly and bland.  Certainly out of character with the three new houses being built on The Holt’s site.

3.     As a property professional I have noted that there is a shortage of bungalows that have not been changed to a chalet style.  This is a prime example of how a small property is being exploited to make it into a larger property than the plot should allow.  4.     This application is not an extension but nearly a complete rebuild, if not then I am sure that the new brickwork would show the alterations for many years.

5.     When we applied for planning permission to build on The Holt’s site we were made aware that a bungalow was next door, our roof-line had to have a dormer for the bathroom together with obscure glass.  If this application is approved we will resubmit a revised application to change the first floor of plot three to match plot two.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC2, GC3, H11, H13, H14, H15, H16, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application site is located within a residential area wherein there are no objections to development in principle, subject to its compliance with the relevant Policies relating to its appearance within the street scene and its effect on the residential amenity of neighbouring properties.

2.     The application site is on a prominent corner plot with the only substantial screening on the corner of the plot itself, the rest of the site boundaries have fencing and / or hedging to a maximum height of approximately 2m, (adjacent to Mid Cross Lane the height of the boundary treatment is lower).  Having noted the representations regarding the design of the resultant structure, it is not considered that the design is so objectionable or intrusive in the street scene to justify a refusal of the application.  In this respect the varied character of both Mid Cross Lane and Cross Lane has been noted.  The area is not considered to be characterised by specious layouts, therefore the 1.05m distance at first floor level to the boundary with ‘The Holt’ is acceptable in light of the requirements of Policy H11.  As such it is not considered that any objections are raised under Polices GC1, H11, H13, H15 and H16.

3.     The windows at first floor level in the north-eastern elevation would permit more overlooking to the neighbouring properties across the road than exists at present, however, given the distance between dwellings on opposite sides of the road, it is not considered that an objection could be raised in this respect.  The windows in the front and rear elevations offer no objections, however, the windows at first floor level in the south-western elevation could potentially overlook the neighbouring dwelling, ‘The Holt’ (whether the existing bungalow or the proposed house), it is considered that a condition requiring the use of obscure glass would be appropriate.  It is not considered that the proposal would be excessively overbearing and should not result in an unacceptable loss of light to any of the neighbouring properties.

4.     Sufficient car parking is provided for on site to comply with Policies TR11 and TR16.

5.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C433 Materials - General Details

(3) C174A No additional windows in first floor of south-western elevation of extension.

(4) C177 Obscure glass in multiple windows in SW elevation - 1st floor only

2001/1125/CH

Case Officer:      Andrew Fuller

Date Received:     03/07/01     Decide by Date:     27/08/01

Parish:     Seer Green     Ward:     Seer Green & Jordans

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS T LIDGLEY

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

Site within 250 m. of active or disused rubbish tip

Mineral Consultation Area

THE APPLICATION

A detached double garage 7m from the property, replacing the existing garage and carport (in the same position, angled at 35 degrees to the highway). The structure is 6.5m wide at the base, 6.7m deep and capped by a fake-hipped roof at 3.1m above the ground.

CONSULTATIONS

Environment Agency:

The Environment Agency has no objection to the proposed development.

Chiltern DC – District Engineer – Highways:

No objection subject to Condition C513 and Informative I253.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997: Policies GC1, H13, h14, h15, H17, H20, TR11 and TR16.

Proposed Alterations to the Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan 1997 - Deposit Copy - July 1998 (including Proposed Modifications- November 2000): Policies GC3.

ISSUES

1.     The application is for the replacement of a single garage and lean-to carport with a double garage unit in the built up area of Seer Green. The proposal will be clearly visible from the street scene; however it will improve the appearance from the road. Its design and use of more sympathetic materials will harmonise both with the main house and the street as a whole. As such the garage will comply with design guidance set out under Local Plan Policy GC1 and H15.

2.     Although gaining 0.8m in height from the existing structure and extending towards the rear boundary by a further metre, the garage will not be overbearing on the private amenity space or windows of 41a and 43 Orchard Road or 2 Howard Road. As such the garage preserves the amenity of this part of Orchard Road and is not in breach of the amenity standards of Local Plan Policies GC3, H13 and H14.

3.     Local Plan Policy TR16states that a forecourt space in front of the garage of not less than 5.5m deep and the width of each garage is required. The forecourt provided is 6m in depth on one side but angled onto the highway and therefore the space is only 1.5m deep on the far side. As the forecourt is not less than that currently provided then no objection is raised in respect of its length. The internal widths of both garages are 2.7m by 5m, which complies with the aforementioned policy. The scheme provides the same parking facility as before and although forecourt arrangement is not ideal, it does not detract from the current parking arrangement and is considered acceptable in terms of Local Plan Policy.   

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Dwelling

(3) C196 Ancillary residential buildings at 41 Orchard Road - garage

(4) C513 Access Layout - Adopted Road : altered access,max width NOT stated

(1) INFORMATIVE - I253 Need to obtain licence from Local Highway Authority to carry out work       

2001/1126/CH

Case Officer:      Iwan Jones

Date Received:     03/07/01     Decide by Date:     27/08/01

Parish:     Chalfont St Giles     Ward:     Chalfont St Giles

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS R GILLAM

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Class A Road

Unclassified road

Mineral Consultation Area

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

CH/825/84: Single storey rear extension and loft conversion with two dormer windows. Conditional permission. Implemented.

99/1402/CH: Conversion of garage to living accommodation and erect detached single garage at front of property. Conditional permission. Not implemented.

99/1744/CH: Extension to dormer window in front elevation. Conditional permission. Not implemented.

THE APPLICATION

The application relates to a first floor extension to a bungalow to provide a two storey dwelling. The height of the existing dwelling would be increased by 1.8m at ridge level and 2.1m at eaves level. Three hipped roof dormers would be constructed on the rear elevation with one on the front elevation. The existing garage would be converted to form additional living accommodation with a new bay window formed. The width and depth of the dwelling would remain the same as existing. Proposed materials have not been indicated on the submitted plan.

PARISH COUNCIL

No objections.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC3, H13, H14, H15, H16, H18, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application site is located within the built up area of Chalfont St Giles where there are no objections in principle to the proposed development subject to compliance with the relevant local plan policies.

2.     The dense coverage of large, mature trees on the northern and eastern boundaries together with a solid row of conifers at a height of 2.5m and 4m on the western and southern boundaries respectively, provides excellent screening. As such, the proposal would not have an effect upon the locality in the vicinity of the proposal. No objection raised in relation to Policy H13(ii).

3.     As the application site is on a lower ground level to that of the neighbouring property Robin Hill and that no windows to habitable rooms are proposed on the eastern flank elevation, an overbearing appearance and any overlooking would not occur. No windows are proposed at first floor level on the western elevation therefore the property Wimborne would not be overlooked. The resulting property would not be visible to the north and south due to the level of screening on each boundary. It is therefore considered that the residential amenities of surrounding properties would not be affected by the proposal. No objections raised in relation to Policies GC3, H13(i) and H14.  

4.     The application site sits between two large detached two storey properties that are to the east and west. It is considered that the resulting dwelling in terms of its scale and height would relate better to these properties than the existing bungalow does. Furthermore, the ground level slopes significantly from east to west which would signify that the resulting roof height would not be at variance with the properties on either side. No objections raised in relation to Policies GC1 and H15.

5.     The height and width of the proposed dormers would reflect the proportion and design of the resulting roof. No objection under Policy H18.  

6.     Although the existing garage would be lost to provide additional living accommodation, sufficient space is provided within the site to comply with the Council’s parking standards. No objections under Policies TR11 and TR16.  

7.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C422 Materials - Bricks and Roofing Tiles

(3) C174A No additional windows in first floor of eastern and western elevations of extension.

(4) C134 Single plan amended by plan no.2001/14/01A received on 30th July 2001.

(5) C403 Landscaping - retain hedge on western and southern bndy at 4m. Height

2001/1127/CH

Case Officer:      Andrew Fuller

Date Received:     03/07/01     Decide by Date:     27/08/01

Parish:     Chalfont St Giles     Ward:     Chalfont St Giles

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR I SANGHRAJKA

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Established Residential Area of Special Character - Local Plan Policy H4

Adjoining Green Belt

Class B Road

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

00/0737/CH   Detached house with detached double garage at front served by new access.   Conditional permission.

00/1980/CH   Erection of entrance gates and piers.   Conditional permission.

THE APPLICATION

A rear conservatory to the left-hand side of the two-storey element of the main dwellinghouse. The structure will be 12.9m in length and 3.5m in depth, with three bays, the central being 0.7m deep and 4.3m wide and the flanking being 0.3m deep and 2.9m wide. The structure will be mono-pitched to 3.3m above the ground, with hipped projection over the bay elements.

PARISH COUNCIL

No objection.

REPRESENTATIONS

One letter from neighbouring residents raising no objections

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997: Policies GC1, H4, H13, H14, H15, H17, TR11 and TR16.

Proposed Alterations to the Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan 1997 - Deposit Copy - July 1998 (including Proposed Modifications- November 2000): Policies GC3.

ISSUES

1.     The application seeks approval for a conservatory to the rear of a large property in the Chalfont St. Giles Established Residential Area of Special Character. The property suggests no particular architectural style and as the proposal is located to the rear, the choice of a Victorian conservatory is of no real concern with regards to this application. As such Local Plan Policy GC1 and H15 is not breached and the structure is considered acceptable.

2.     Although the proposal is particularly large the scale of the house and the extent of the garden comfortably accommodate such a structure. The 1.8m fencing and 3m hedging to the boundaries of the rear garden obscure all but two first floor windows of ‘Claren’ (neighbouring property to the north east). As such the proposal does not compromise the existing amenity of the neighbourhood. Local Plan Policy GC3, H13 and H14 are satisfied.

3.     The integral double garage and extensive forecourt cater for more than the off street parking requirements housed under Local Plan Policy TR11 and TR16.

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

2001/1129/CH

Case Officer:      Andrew Fuller

Date Received:     28/06/01     Decide by Date:     22/08/01

Parish:     Amersham     Ward:     Amersham the Hill

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS EVANS

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Amersham - Weller Estate Conservation Area

Established Residential Area of Special Character - Local Plan Policy H4

Unclassified road

Thames Water - groundwater protection zone

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

97/0006/TC   Repollarding of two lime trees within the conservation area.

00/0025/TC   Felling of a maple and height reduction of a line of ten conifers all within the conservation area.

00/1674/CH   Single-storey side/rear extension incorporating replacement garage.   Conditional permission.

THE APPLICATION

A rear conservatory 8.7m wide (the full width of the property) and 3.1m deep. Positioned to the east side is proposed a half-hexagonal bay window (4.9m wide and 1.7m deep). The roof is hipped up against the house at 3.6m.

TOWN COUNCIL

Recommend approval.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan – 1997: Policies GC1, H4, H13, H14, H15, H17, CA1, TR11 and TR16.

Proposed Alterations to the Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 – Deposit Copy – July 1998 (including Proposed Modifications – November 2000): Policies GC3.

ISSUES

1.     The application is within the ‘Weller Estate’ conservation area and one of Amersham-on-the-Hill’s Established Residential Areas of special Character. The vicinity of the property is characterised by white rendered properties with long metro-land style roofs. The application is for a Victorian style conservatory, which although not particularly in the style of the area, is considered appropriate in terms of Local plan Policy GC1, H4, H15 and CA1 (being located to the rear of the property, not affecting the conservation area).

2.     The property has an alleyway to the west behind the 1.8m fencing and detached garage, with No. 23 overlooking from beyond. This in no way is considered detrimental to the amenity of neighbours or the conservatory itself in terms of Local Plan Policy GC3, H13 and H14. When considering this application in terms of the policies from the east, it is also considered acceptable. Although 4.6m deep (an addition of 1m in depth to the previous unimplemented approval 00/1674/CH), it is set in by 1m from the boundary and behind a 2m hedge. As such the windows to the rear of No. 27 will be able to view the structure, but not to a degree that it will affect the enjoyment neighbouring residents currently have of their property. Acceptable clear lines of vision are preserved from the centre of all windows.

3.     The single detached garage and ample forecourt caters for Local Plan Policy TR11 and TR16.

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

(3) C174 No additional windows in east elevation of extension

2001/1135/CH

Case Officer:      Geoffrey Hugall

Date Received:     04/07/01     Decide by Date:     28/08/01

Parish:     Latimer     Ward:     Ashley Green & Latimer

App Type:     Application for Listed Building Consent

Applicant:      CHRISTOPHER SWART

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Chenies & Latimer Conservation Area

Green Belt other than GB4 or GB5 settlement

Within Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Historic Park or Garden

Unclassified road

Area of Special Advertisement Control

Archaeological site

Grade 2 Listed Building

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

AM/984/73     Insertion of additional windows.

AM/62/74     New windows, approved.

THE APPLICATION

The application is to replace an existing window with a door on the south elevation.  The door and frame size would be 1.2m wide and 1.96m high.

CONSULTATIONS

Historic Buildings Officer:  This is a proposal to re-instate a door that was altered to a window opening as recently as 1980.  It affects an outbuilding to The Old Rectory.  There are no objections to this re-instatement on historic building grounds, and the proposal is to be recommended.  The new black-painted door will harmonise with the black weatherboarding, and will be far less eye-catching than the existing white window.  It is also far more appropriate to the character of an outbuilding.

POLICIES

The Adopted Buckinghamshire County Structure Plan 1991 – 2011 Policy HE1

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997: Policy LB1

ISSUES

1.     The proposal comprises the replacement of an existing window with a door on the south elevation of The Old Rectory.  The Historic Buildings Officer has advised that, subject to conditions, the proposal would not be detrimental to the special character of the building and accordingly objections are not raised to this proposal.

2.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional consent

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C141 Listed Building Consent - Time Limit

(2) C142 Listed Building Consent - List of Works

(3) C435 Listed Building Materials - Affecting Exterior

2001/1140/CH

Case Officer:      Andrew Fuller

Date Received:     05/07/01     Decide by Date:     29/08/01

Parish:     Chesham Bois     Ward:     Chesham Bois & Weedon

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS CRAYFORD

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Established Residential Area of Special Character - Local Plan Policy H4

Unclassified road

THE APPLICATION

To vary Condition (5) of Application CH/2022/81 which states that.

The garage hereby permitted shall only be used for the garaging of private motor vehicles and shall not be adapted or used for living purposes without the express grant of planning permission.

REASON: To ensure that adequate and satisfactory provision is made for the garaging of vehicles clear of all carriageways and in order to allow the Local Planning Authority to control the development in detail.

The application proposes to brick the garage door up flush with the elevation and insert a half hexagon flat roofed bay window (2.5m wide and 0.5m deep).

PARISH COUNCIL

The Parish Council has no objections to the garage conversion. However, the Council considered that the plans were of a poor quality with only the minimum detail present. We do not normally endorse garage conversions, but in this case there appears to be adequate off-road parking, although not shown.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC3, H4, H13, H14, H15, H17, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The removal of the door and installation of a bay window do not greatly affect the appearance of the property and as such are considered acceptable under Local Plan Design Policy GC1 and H15.

2.     The front and side garden area is well screened by trees and hedging and can not be viewed by any neighbours and therefore the project will not be to the detriment of neighbouring amenity. Policies GC3, H13 and H14 are abided with.

3.     The remaining gravel forecourt can comfortably stand three cars including a turning head and as such provide adequately to overcome the above condition and cater for the necessary parking required for compliance with Local Plan Policy TR11 and TR16.  

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

(3) The garage conversion hereby permitted shall only be occupied as part of the existing dwelling on the site and shall at no time be occupied as an independent dwelling unit.

Reason: The establishment of an independent dwelling unit within the curtilage of the main dwelling would lead to an intensification in the use of the site which would be out of keeping with and detrimental to the character of its surroundings.

2001/1142/CH

Case Officer:      Iwan Jones

Date Received:     05/07/01     Decide by Date:     29/08/01

Parish:     Chalfont St Peter     Ward:     Gold Hill

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR LLOYD RESSLER

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Conservation Area setting affected

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

Northolt Airfield safeguarding zone

Mineral Consultation Area

THE APPLICATION

The application relates to the erection of a single storey extension to the north western side elevation. It would utilise the area between the existing house and detached garage. As a result of the proposal the garage would become attached to the dwelling. The extension would measure 3.7m wide, 11m deep and to a pitched roof height of 4.1m. It would project beyond the existing rear elevation of the garage by 1.5m and the house by 3.7m. The proposed materials would match those of the existing dwelling.

PARISH COUNCIL

No objection.

REPRESENTATIONS

One letter of no objection.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan – 1997 (including the adopted alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC3, H13, H14, H15, CA2, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application site is located within the built up area of Chalfont St Peter and is adjacent to a Conservation Area where there are no objections in principle subject to compliance with the relevant local plan policies.

2.     The site is well screened whilst the proposed extension would not project beyond the existing front elevation and would be subordinate in height to the existing dwelling. No objection raised in relation to Policies GC1, H13(ii), H15 and CA2.

3.     The proposed extension would project beyond the existing rear elevation by 3.7m and would have a window on its rear elevation. Although the neighbouring property to the rear, Lilac Cottage, has a conservatory on its south eastern elevation, no overlooking would occur due to the solid row of 3m conifers on the boundary. No objections raised in terms of Policies GC3, H13(i) and H14.  

4.     Sufficient space is provided within the site to comply with the Council’s parking standards. No objection raised in terms of Policies TR11 and TR16.  

5.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

2001/1143/CH

Case Officer:      Geoffrey Hugall

Date Received:     04/07/01     Decide by Date:     28/08/01

Parish:     Seer Green     Ward:     Seer Green & Jordans

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS T PARSLOW

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

Site within 250 m. of active or disused rubbish tip

Mineral Consultation Area

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

THE APPLICATION

1.     The proposed front extension would project 1.5m in front of the existing elevation and would cover the full width of the dwelling, this would have a mono pitched roof over which would join the main dwelling at a height of 3.6m.  In addition a tiled canopy is proposed which would sit on two timber pots which would be a further 1.2m in front of the existing elevation (projecting 2.7m in total).

2.     At the rear a first floor extension is proposed over an existing flat roofed projection.  This would project an additional 2.9m at first floor level with a pitched and hipped roof over.  In addition a two-storey extension is proposed adjacent to that above.  This extension would be 3.05m in width and would be level with the existing dwelling’s flank wall and would attach to the other extension noted above.  It would be 5.1m in depth, have an eaves height to match that of the existing dwelling and a ridge height at 6.9m.

CONSULTATIONS

Environment Agency – Unable to comment.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC2, GC3, H11, H13, H14, H15, H16, H17, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The design of the extensions is considered acceptable and, although relatively substantial given the size of the existing dwelling, are not considered to be out of scale or proportion given the plot’s characteristics and the general character of the area.  The front extensions will project closer to Orchard Road than at present, notwithstanding this it is not considered that the front extensions would appear intrusive in the street scene and consequently no objections are raised in this respect.

2.     The amenities of the neighbouring dwelling at 47a should not be affected to any significant degree.  This neighbouring property is set to the rear of No.47 and the proposed extensions would not appear overbearing when viewed from this property.  Given the orientation of the dwellings no significant loss of light would result.  Although the neighbouring property has a number of windows on its ground floor flank elevation facing No.47, given the changing ground levels (No.47 set higher), the windows at present look out onto a fence on the boundary and with the existing garage in between it is not considered that any objections could be raised in this respect.  The dwelling at No.1 Highlands Road had a first floor rear extension and a single storey side / rear extension constructed under 87/2222/CH, the result being that the proposed extension to No.47 would not appear too overbearing and should not affect their amenities to any significant degree.  A number of windows are proposed on the elevation facing No.1, at first floor level these are to serve a bathroom and a shower room, as such they could be reasonably required to be fitted with obscure glass.  On the ground floor there is at present a window facing to the boundary, this will be removed and another fitted in its place further forward in the elevation, given this it is not considered that there would be any substantial increase in overlooking to the neighbouring property.

3.     Sufficient car parking provision is available on site to comply with Policies TR11 and TR16.

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

(3) C174A No additional windows in first floor of flank elevations of extension.

2001/1145/CH

Case Officer:      Tony Clements

Date Received:     05/07/01     Decide by Date:     29/08/01

Parish:     Great Missenden     Ward:     Great Missenden

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS P DEACON

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Established Residential Area of Special Character - Local Plan Policy H4

Adjoining Green Belt

Within Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Unclassified road

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

CH/1251/84   Single storey sun room. Conditional permission – implemented.

THE APPLICATION

The application is for a part single storey/ part two storey front extension, incorporating a double garage, and a two storey side extension. The ground floor element of the front extension is to measure 10m wide and part 4.8m/ part 6.8m/ part 7.1m deep. It is to incorporate a part flat/ part pitched roof over the entrance lobby element of the extension. The pitched element is to be 2.1m wide, 6.4m long and 3.7m high. A section of this pitched roof, 3.6m deep, is to be glazed. Either side of this pitched roof element is a flat roofed section 800mm wide and 4m long. There is to be a dummy pitched roof across the front of the extension, 3.3m high. There is also to be a pitch over the rear section of the single storey element of the front extension, 3.9m high. The first floor element of the front extension is to measure 6.3m wide and part 7.1m/ part 10.7m deep. It is to form a front gable 7.4m high, 400mm lower than the existing front gable projection. The ridge length of that element of the extension is to be 8.4m. The extension is also to extend the existing main ridge of the dwelling, which is 7.8m high, by 2.4m. It is have a catslide roof. A pitch is also to be created above an existing window in the front elevation of the dwelling above the glazed roof of the extension. It is to be 6.3m high.

The two storey side extension is to measure 9.5m deep by part 5.9m/ part 5.4m wide. It is to have a pitched roof 7.8m high, equalling the height of the existing ridge, and is to have a rear and side gable projection, both 7.8m high. The extension is also to have an open- sided porch on the side elevation, with a pitched roof 2.4m wide, 900mm deep and 3.5m high.

PARISH COUNCIL

No objections.

REPRESENTATIONS

3 letters received. Two supporting the application: one (from a nearby property, Bushmills) stating that the extension will improve the property and the area, and that the gable end should be altered to a hip to give the roofline a balanced appearance, and to soften the view from the northern end of Broomfield Hill; the other  (from the neighbouring property, Four Oaks) stating that the extensions should focus on the elevation of the property adjacent to the open fields, rather than reducing the gap between Chantry and Four Oaks, and that the extension adjacent to the boundary with Four Oaks will create a feeling of proximity and will put at risk a Laburnum tree. Potential loss of privacy should be overcome through the use of obscure glass and that the relevant windows should be fixed shut and should permission be granted, it is requested that some screening be erected on the boundary with Four Oaks.  The third letter (from a nearby property, Barn House) states that the resultant property would be too wide for the width of the plot, that the north wing is too long and would be too conspicuous when viewed from the valley, and that the extensions should be reduced.

CONSULTATIONS

District Forestry Officer – Likely loss of laburnam, purple leafed plum and some small trees/ shrubs. None important although provide some screening.

New in/ out access shown on plan.

Two trees shown in wrong positions.

Not possible to construct drive as shown and retain trees.

Large sycamore on road frontage – prominent tree.

Maturing beech in front garden – suppressed on one side by sycamore.

Understand agent now submitting revised plan showing narrower drive and retaining sycamore.

Informative advising ‘no- dig’ method of construction would be useful.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC2, GC3, LSQ1, H4, H11, H13, H14, H15, H16, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application site is located within an Established Residential Area of Special Character wherein extensions to residential dwellings are acceptable under the terms of the relevant local plan policies. The site is also located within the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty wherein it is the Council’s policy to conserve or enhance the natural landscape beauty of the area.

2.     The part single storey/ part two storey front extension will not appear overbearing or visually intrusive when viewed from the neighbouring dwelling, Four Oaks. Though the flank elevation of the extension will be sited approximately one metre from the boundary with this dwelling, the roof of the extension is to pitch away from it. Overlooking to the rear conservatory and the private amenity space of Four Oaks is an issue that can be overcome through the use of a condition requiring that the velux windows serving both the bathroom and bedroom (in the south west elevation of the extension) be obscure glazed and non- opening, considering that the sill level of both windows is 1.5m above the internal first floor. Overlooking from the balcony of the dwelling already exists. This will not change.

3.     As the dwelling is sited adjacent to a footpath and open fields to the north east of the site, the two storey side extension will not have an adverse impact upon the surrounding dwellings. Overlooking from this element of the extension will not be an issue.

3.     Though they represent significant additions to the dwelling, the extensions respect the scale and proportions of the existing dwelling and will improve its appearance. The glazed pitched roof of the front extension will not appear prominent when viewed from the front and will not detract from the front elevation of the dwelling. Though the dwelling would, as a result of the extensions, be one metre from either flank boundary, and would therefore fill virtually the whole width of the plot, no objection is raised in terms of the impact upon the street scene as many of the dwellings on Broomfield Hill fill most of the width of their respective plots. The resultant dwelling would be in keeping with those in the Established Residential Area of Special Character.

4.     Located with an Established Residential Area of Special Character, the extensions will not detract from the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. No objections are raised in terms of Policy LSQ1.

5.     The floorspace of the dwelling already exceeds 120sq. m. There are therefore no implications for the Council’s Adopted Carparking Standards.

6.     The District Forestry Officer is not concerned about the impact of the proposed extensions upon some trees within the curtilage of the site. However, the impact of the extended driveway and new vehicular access upon two trees in the front garden is of concern. It is realised that these works do not require planning permission. Following the receipt of an amended plan showing the extended driveway to be re- sited away from the two trees, which will reduce the potential impact of the works upon the trees, an informative can be imposed suggesting that a ‘no dig’ method of construction should be used for the driveway to further reduce the potential impact of the driveway upon the trees.

7.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

(3) The velux windows in the south west elevation of the development hereby approved shall not be glazed other than with obscured glass, at any time, and shall be fixed shut.

Reason: To protect the amenities and privacy of the adjoining property.

(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any Order revoking or re-enacting that Order, with or without modification), no windows/dormer windows/ velux windows other than those expressly authorised by this permission, or as subsequently agreed in writing by the local planning authority, shall be inserted or constructed at any time at first floor level or above in the south west elevation of the extension hereby permitted.

Reason: To protect the amenities and privacy of the adjoining property.

(5) The velux windows in the south west elevation of the extension hereby permitted shall not be enlarged without the prior approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To protect the privacy and amenities of the occupiers of the adjoining property.

(6) C134 Single plan amended by plan (no 5420 Sk4 Rev.A) received on 14 August 2001

(1) INFORMATIVE - I253 Need to obtain licence from Local Highway Authority to carry out work       

(2) INFORMATIVE - The applicant is advised that the compass points indicated on plan no.5420 Sk4 received by the Local Planning Authority on 5 July 2001 are incorrect.

(3) INFORMATIVE - It is suggested that a 'no- dig' method of construction, as decribed in the Arboricultural Association's Practice Note No.1, be used during the construction of the driveway to avoid damage to the root systems of the two trees indicated on Plan No.5420 Sk4 Rev A.

2001/1149/CH

Case Officer:      Geoffrey Hugall

Date Received:     06/07/01     Decide by Date:     30/08/01

Parish:     Amersham     Ward:     Chesham Bois & Weedon

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR & MRS S NORRIS

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Adjoining Green Belt

Unclassified road

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

CH/1761/83     Single storey front extension, approved.

95/0274/CH     Alterations and single storey front / side / rear extension, approved and

THE APPLICATION

The single storey rear extension has a floor area of 5.05m by 9.9m with a pitched roof over reaching a height of 4.2m, the eaves would be at 2.4m, there would be a gable feature at the centre of the extension above the doors.  The application also includes two covered areas on the south-western elevation.  A new 2.5m high wall would be constructed 0.225m behind the front elevation of the study.  Behind this wall the covered areas at 2.1m in height would be constructed, these would have polycarbonate sheeting over.  The larger covered area would have an area of 2.1m by 5.15m, the smaller covered area to the rear of the existing kitchen projection would be 1.5m by 2.85m.

TOWN COUNCIL

Recommend approve.

CONSULTATIONS

Forestry Officer –

Proposed extension shown a metre from boundary with 22 Weedon Lane

     1.8m close-boarded fence on boundary

     4m Leyland cypress screen just beyond boundary

     Still young vigorous trees

Proposed work unlikely to have significant effect on tree roots if reasonable care taken

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC2, GC3, H13, H14, H15, H17, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     Although at the rear of the dwelling the extension’s roof has been designed in such a way that it could be visible from the road.  Notwithstanding this it would not appear intrusive and as such it is not considered that objections are raised with regard to its impact upon the street scene.  No objections are raised to the design of the extensions which respect the dimensions of the plot and the scale and proportions of the existing dwelling.  In this respect it is noted that the previous application a rear conservatory and extension to the dining room area was approved.

2.     As noted above, permission was granted for extensions in a similar position to those subject to this application.  Given this and the substantial screening on both boundaries, four metre high cypress screen adjacent to No.22 and a 2m high Laurel hedge with a 3m high conifer screen behind on the boundary with No.24, it is not considered that the proposal would adversely affect the amenities of the neighbouring properties.  The proposed extension would be relatively close to the cypress hedge on the boundary with No.22, however the District Forestry Officer is of the opinion that the work is unlikely to have a significant effect on the roots is reasonable care is taken.  As such no objections are raised under Polices GC2, GC3, H13 and H15.  

3.     No objections are raised to the covered areas and to the proposed wall.

4.     No adverse car parking issues arise, no objections under Polices TR11 and TR16.

5.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

(3) C174A No additional windows in side elevations of extension.

(1) INFORMATIVE - The applicant's cooperation is requested to ensure that during construction, care is taken to ensure that as little damage as possible is done to the root system and stability of the Leyland cypress screen on the boundary with No.22, in this respect a suitable type of foundation that would minimise any damage would be desirable.

2001/1155/CH

Case Officer:      Andrew Fuller

Date Received:     02/07/01     Decide by Date:     26/08/01

Parish:     Amersham     Ward:     Amersham Common

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS A JANKOWSKA

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Adjoining Green Belt

Class A Road

THE APPLICATION

To infill a covered canopied area to the left of the front door, 3m wide and 1.5m deep. The structure is 2.7m high and flat roofed.

TOWN COUNCIL

Recommend approval.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC3, H13, H14, H15, H17, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application is to partly infill a canopied area to the front of a property in Amersham Common. No planning history exists for the canopy and therefore the proposal is not considered as permitted development, as it would otherwise be, due to the absence of evidence indicating the period of time the canopy has been in existence.

2.     This property is well obscured from the highway and as such the infill, which in itself is not a great alteration to the appearance of the property, will not be easily viewed from the public domain. The dense hedge to the south boundary screens it from No. 137, while the front right-hand side projection obscures most of it from No. 141. As such its design merits do not render it a significant alteration to the property in terms of Local Plan Policy GC1 and H15.

3.     Although the existing canopy and piers were constructed in the absence of planning permission they are established and ensure that the new alterations will not greatly affect the impact on neighbours. Furthermore windows were avoided in the flank walling, ensures that the project raises no amenity issues in terms of detriment to neighbours. Local Plan Policy GC3, H13 and H14 are considered satisfied.

4.     The extensive driveway ensures compliance with Policies TR11 and TR16.  

5.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

2001/1156/CH

Case Officer:      Iwan Jones

Date Received:     06/07/01     Decide by Date:     30/08/01

Parish:     Chalfont St Peter     Ward:     Chalfont St Peter Central

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      KIRSTY MACFARLANE

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

Northolt Airfield safeguarding zone

Mineral Consultation Area

THE APPLICATION

The application relates to the erection of a two storey side extension to the northern elevation. It would measure 4.9m deep, 1m wide and to a hipped roof height of 5.5m. A first floor rear extension forms part of the application with its pitched roof integrating into that of the proposed side extension. It would measure 3.2m wide and to a maximum depth of 3.5m. Dormer windows are also proposed within the front and rear elevations. All proposed materials would match those of the existing.

PARISH COUNCIL

No objection.

REPRESENTATIONS

One letter of representation has been received from the neighbouring property No.37 raising no objection to the proposal.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC2, GC3, H13, H14, H15, H16, H18, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application site is located within the built up area of Chalfont St Peter where there are no objections in principle to the proposed development subject to compliance with the relevant local plan policies.

2.     The side extension would be set back 4.2m from the existing front elevation whist a distance of 1.1m would be maintained between the flank elevation and the northern boundary. The roof of the side extension would be hipped and subordinate to the existing roof height. The side extension is not therefore considered to be detrimental to the character and appearance of the street scene. No objections raised in relation to Policies GC1, H13(ii), H15 and H16.

3.     No windows are proposed on the flank elevation of the side extension. Having regard also to its height, scale and bulk it would have no impact upon the neighbouring property No.41. The rear dormer would not either overlook this property having regard to the proposed first floor rear extension and the pitched roof of the existing single storey rear extension. The amount of overlooking that would occur into the rear garden No.37 would not be considered to be unreasonable. No objections raised in relation to Policies GC2, GC3, H13(i) and H14.

4.     The height and width of the front dormer would relate well to the existing roof and would reflect the size and design of the existing ground floor bay windows. No objection raised in relation to Policy H18.

5.     Three parking spaces would be provided within the site to comply with the Council’s requirements. No objections raised in terms of Policies TR11 and TR16.     

6.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

(3) C174A No additional windows in first floor of northern elevation of extension.

2001/1158/CH

Case Officer:      Thomas Gabriel

Date Received:     06/07/01     Decide by Date:     30/08/01

Parish:     Great Missenden     Ward:     Great Missenden

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      A J AND J L PRICE

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Conservation Area setting affected

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Within Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Unclassified road

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

00/1950/CH   Single storey side extension and front porch. Conditional permission – not implemented.

THE APPLICATION

The application is for roof alterations, including the formation of a second front gable, a single storey side extension and a front porch (an amendment to 00/1950/CH). The side extension is to measure 5.75m deep and part 4.35m/ part 2.8m/ part 2.6m wide. The roof over the extension is to form a continuous slope from the second front gable, which is to be 7.7m high, equalling the height of the existing front gable.

PARISH COUNCIL

No objections.

POLICIES

The Adopted Buckinghamshire County Structure Plan 1991 – 2011: Policy HE1.

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC2, GC3, LSQ1, H13, H14, H15, TR11, TR16 and CA2.

ISSUES

1.     The principle of this extension has been established by the granting of permission of the previous application on the site (reference 00/1950/CH). The current application differs from the previous scheme in that the rear element of the extension has been widened by 850mm, forming a flank wall 5.75m in depth, with alterations to the roofslope over that element of the extension, the pitch of which is to be 5.2m high. A small section of the roofslope, 1.2m in width, is to be omitted to accommodate an existing window in the flank elevation of the dwelling. A window measuring 950mm by 1.3m is to be inserted in the rear elevation of the extension. The issue to have regard to here is whether new issues have arisen which may affect the decision.

2.     The amended proposal will not impinge upon the amenities of the neighbouring dwellings. The increased bulk will only have a marginally greater impact upon the street scene and the appearance of the dwelling. It will not represent overdevelopment of the site or result in overlooking of the neighbouring or adjacent properties. The new proposal is considered acceptable in these respects.

3.     The amended extension will not adversely affect the setting of the adjacent Conservation Area or detract from the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. No objections are raised in terms of Policy HE1 of the Adopted Buckinghamshire County Structure Plan or Policies LSQ1 and CA2 of the Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan.

4.     The floorspace of the dwelling already exceeds 120sq. m. There are therefore no implications for the Council’s Adopted Carparking Standards.  

5.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

2001/1161/CH

Case Officer:      Iwan Jones

Date Received:     09/07/01     Decide by Date:     02/09/01

Parish:     Chesham     Ward:     Newtown

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR I AHMED

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

Thames Water - groundwater protection zone

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

90/1768/CH: Two storey rear extension. Refused.

91/0472/CH: Two storey rear extension. Refused.

91/1187/CH: Single storey rear extension with storage/children’s play area in loft space. Refused.

92/0069/CH: Single storey rear extension. Conditional permission. Not implemented.

97/0520/CH: Single storey rear extension. Conditional permission. Not implemented.

99/1240/CH: Single storey rear extension. Conditional permission. Implemented.

THE APPLICATION

The application relates to the construction of a side covered walkway to the northern elevation. It would measure 1.3m wide, 4.7m deep and 2.7m high. It would be built out of corrugated thermoclear polycarbonate sheeting with a cedarwood gate.

TOWN COUNCIL

Approval.

CONSULTATIONS

Environment Agency: Unable to respond.

Thames Water: No objection.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC3, H13, H14 ,H15, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application site is located within the built up area of Chesham where there are no objections in principle to the proposed development subject to compliance with the relevant local plan policies.

2.     Due to the scale of the development proposed, it is considered that it would have no effect upon the street scene or on the amenities of neighbouring properties. No objection raised in relation to Policies GC1, GC3, H13, H14 and H15.

3.     No off street parking is provided within the site or any of the other properties within the row. No objection raised in relation to Policies TR11 and TR16.

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C432 Materials - As on Plan or Subsequently Specified

2001/1163/CH

Case Officer:      Iwan Jones

Date Received:     09/07/01     Decide by Date:     02/09/01

Parish:     Chesham Bois     Ward:     Chesham Bois & Weedon

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR JONES

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

THE APPLICATION

The application relates to the erection of a conservatory to the rear elevation measuring 7.4m wide, 4.3m deep from the furthest rear elevation wall and 3.8m high.

PARISH COUNCIL

No objection.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC3, H13, H14, H15, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application site is located within the built up area of Chesham Bois where there are no objections in principle to the proposed development subject to compliance with the relevant local plan policies.

2.     No effect upon street scene due to siting of conservatory to the rear of the property. No objection under H13(ii).

3.     The proposed conservatory would not have an effect upon either neighbouring property due to the level of screening on both the north eastern and south western boundaries, consisting of solid conifers and a 2m close boarded fence respectively. No objection under GC3 and H14.

4.     The scale, height and design of the conservatory is considered acceptable. No objection under H15.

5.     Sufficient parking within curtilage to comply with Council’s Standards. No objection under TR11 and TR16.

6.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

2001/1164/CH

Case Officer:      Kathryn York

Date Received:     09/07/01     Decide by Date:     02/09/01

Parish:     Penn     Ward:     Penn

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      P J COOPER

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Built-up area other than Local Plan Policy  H2 or H4

Unclassified road

Mineral Consultation Area

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

CH/2346/79  Single storey extension at rear.  Permitted and implemented.

86/229/CH  Single storey rear and side extension incorporating garage.  Permitted and implemented.

THE APPLICATION

Proposes part two storey part single storey front extension.  The two-storey extension is on the site of an existing single storey front projection, which is to be demolished.  The extension measures 4.070m wide x 3.4m deep, with a pitched roof 7.5m high.  The single storey extension infils an area between the two storey extension and an existing two storey front gable projection, and measures 4.45m wide x 2.4m deep, with a sloping roof 3.9m high.

PARISH COUNCIL

No comments.

REPRESENTATIONS

Letter received from occupier of No.41 supporting application.

CONSULTATIONS

South Bucks District Council: No objection.

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC3, H11, H13, H14, H15, H16, H17, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application site is located in the built up area of Knotty Green, where there are no objections to the proposed development in principle subject to compliance with the relevant local plan policies.

2.     The extension is sited away from the neighbouring properties.  There will be no adverse impact on these properties, and therefore no objections are raised in this respect.

3.     The proposed development is well screened by mature trees on the front and side boundaries.  The front gable projection matches an existing two-storey front gable projection.  There will be no adverse impact on the street scene and no objections are raised.

4.     Adequate parking space exists within the curtilage of the site.  No objections raised.

5.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

2001/1167/CH

Case Officer:      Andrew Fuller

Date Received:     10/07/01     Decide by Date:     03/09/01

Parish:     Seer Green     Ward:     Seer Green & Jordans

App Type:     Full application

Applicant:      MR AND MRS WRIGHT

SITE CONSTRAINTS

Established Residential Area of Special Character - Local Plan Policy H4

Class C Road

Mineral Consultation Area

RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

97/1475/CH   Insert two dormer windows in front elevation.

THE APPLICATION

A conservatory to the rear right-hand side of the property (4.1m wide, 3.8m deep and 3.3m to the ridge of the hipped roof).

POLICIES

The Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including The Adopted Alterations May 2001): Policies GC1, GC3, H4, H13, H14, H15, H17, TR11 and TR16.

ISSUES

1.     The application is in the Seer Green Established Residential Area of Special Character, where it is hidden from public view to the rear of the property. The structure is acceptable in terms of design and as such is in compliance with Local Plan Policy GC1, H4 and H15.

2.     Replacing a smaller sunroom, the conservatory is acceptable in volume and location. Due to the 2 to 2.5m hedging round the rear garden, the structure will only be view from first floor secondary side windows to No. 18. As such the conservatory is considered unobtrusive and compatible with Local Plan Policy.

3.     The property has an ample forecourt to satisfy Local Plan Transport Policy TR11 and TR16.

4.     The following recommendation is made having regard to the above and also to the content of the Human Rights Act 1998.

RECOMMENDATION: Conditional permission

Subject to the following conditions

(1) C108 General Time Limit

(2) C431 Materials of Development to Match Those of Existing Building

(3) C134 Single plan amended by plan (no PC3802) received on 01/08/01

2001/1169/CH

Case Officer:      Iwan Jones

Date Received:     09/07/01     Decide by Date:     02/09/01

Parish:     Chalfont St Peter     Ward:     Austenwood

App Type:     Full application