Meeting documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHILTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL |
|
|
|
MINUTES of the Meeting of the EXECUTIVE |
|
|
|
held on 10 JULY 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IN ATTENDANCE: Councillors Ms J E Bramwell and Mrs V Head |
|
|
|
|
|
25. MINUTES |
|
|
|
The Minutes of the Executive held on 6 June 2001, copies of which had been circulated, were signed by the Chairman as a correct record. |
|
|
|
|
|
26. ANNUAL FINANCIAL STRATEGY REVIEW |
|
|
|
a) Council Objectives and Financial Policy |
|
|
|
The Executive had before it a detailed report which was indicated as being within the Budgetary framework and contained a key decision within the Forward Plan. It was noted that it would not be implemented immediately but would be used to determine targets for the revised revenue budget. |
|
|
|
The Director of Corporate Services advised that the purpose of the Annual Financial Strategy Review was to examine and forecast the Council's financial position. It formed the beginning of the financial budgetary reports to be considered by the Executive in the forthcoming year. Attention was drawn to the Council's overall objectives for the next few years which were being translated into a Community Plan to be published shortly. The purpose of the Council's financial policies was to ensure that appropriate financial resources were available to support the Council's objectives. The key financial policies for both capital and revenue were outlined in the officer's report. |
|
|||
Councillor Banham supported the sound financial policies as outlined but emphasised the heavy expenditure which was anticipated and the need to maintain capital and revenue balances. Councillor Phillips acknowledged the need to approve the financial policies as set out but indicated that if the Council had changes imposed upon it by the Government, these policies would need to be re-assessed. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
b) Financial Developments |
|||
|
|||
The Director of Corporate Services outlined the financial developments likely to affect local authority finance. He explained the situation with regard to capital finance; revenue grant distribution and a comprehensive spending review and drew particular attention to:- |
|||
|
|||
This Council does not need a capital allocation as it is debt-free. |
|||
|
|||
A revenue grant distribution white paper would be published in October concerning the promotion of public service agreements. |
|||
|
|||
Notification that the DLTR was likely to change existing policies on concessionary fares to reduce the age at which men were able to claim such fares from 65 to 60. The possible high cost to the Council was explained with an indication that this policy might be implemented without additional grant being made to the Council. The policy could be introduced by April 2003 at the latest. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
That the developments in local government finance be noted and a further report be made when the white paper is published. |
|||
|
|||
c) Capital Finance Strategy |
|||
|
|||
The officer's report outlined the development of the Council's capital programme for the four year period 2001/2002 to 2005/2006. The Executive was reminded that it was the Council's policy that capital balances should not fall below £11 million. The projected capital spending through to March 2006 would, if all capital programme projects were carried out, mean that very slightly under £11 million would be left at that date. |
|||
|
|||
Although it was anticipated that not all capital expenditure projects would be carried out, it would be necessary for the September Executive meeting to give the capital programme careful consideration. |
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
And |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
d) Revenue Finance Strategy |
|||
|
|||
The Director of Corporate Services drew attention to the factors of known changes to the Revenue Finance Strategy including:- |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
Although the above factors would increase the 2001/2002 net revenue budget by £130,000, it was not thought that the Executive would need to recommend a supplementary estimate at this stage. Attention was drawn to the situation arising from the tri-annual evaluation of the superannuation fund which could result in further pressures on revenue expenditure. |
|
|
|
Attention was drawn to the reduction in interest income arising from the fall in interest rates. It was indicated that there was no assumption made that there would be revenue savings from best value. |
|
|
|
One of the tasks which the Council would be undertaking was to reformat budgets between the various portfolios and to set targets for each of these. |
|
|
|
RESOLVED – |
|
|
|
That the developments in the Council's revenue expenditure, the use of interest and the future of Government grant be noted. |
|
|
|
And |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27. FORWARD PLAN |
|
|
|
Attached as an appendix to the officer's report was the proposed Forward Plan for August-November 2001. The Chief Executive drew attention to the fact that the plan would need to be published in the middle of July. Members were asked to indicate any amendments which they wished to make. Two minor amendments were indicated. |
|
|
|
RESOLVED – |
|
|
|
1. That the Forward Plan for August-November 2001 be approved. |
|
|
|
2. That the officers be granted delegated authority to add items to the Forward Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
28. EXECUTIVE – CURRENT ISSUES |
|
|
|
a) Community Plan |
|
|
|
It was noted that following consideration at the last Council meeting, work was progressing on a consultation exercise involving all Members of the Council. A discussion paper was being prepared and the consultation period would be focussed on the autumn. |
|
|
|
Councillor Dodd advised that the Scrutiny Committee would be supporting the consultation on the Community Plan possibly by inviting key outside organisations to participate. The matter was noted. |
|
|
|
b) Drinking on Streets and in Public Places |
|
|
|
The Chief Executive advised that a number of Members had raised this issue. Amersham Town Council had expressed acute concern over the problems at the King George V Playing Fields. The matter was likely to be assisted by the introduction of CCTV which the Police had recently agreed could be introduced. |
|
|
|
The Executive requested a report reviewing options in respect of bye-laws or the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. |
|
|
|
c) Prestwood Leisure Centre |
|
|
|
Members were advised that discussions were continuing with the Prestwood Sports Leisure Association and Sport England and decisions were now required on funding matters and the lease. Members were asked to consider whether this proposal should be moved into the "committed" section of the budget. |
|
RESOLVED – |
|
|
|
That the Prestwood Leisure Centre funding be moved into the committed section of the budget. |
|
|
|
|
|
d) Abandoned Cars |
|
|
|
By reference to a paper prepared by the Thames Valley Partnership concerning "Abandoned Vehicles; Speeding Up the Process", a copy of which was appended to the officer's report, the Chief Executive outlined the problems with regard to disposing of abandoned cars. Members indicated that they felt that the speed of removal must be this Council's primary concern and that the Police should be asked to co-operate to secure this objective. |
|
|
|
Discussion took place on whether this Council should consider a policy of picking up abandoned vehicles from home as well as on open land and on highway verges. It was felt that the views of the Fire Services and the Council's contractors, Messrs Onyx, were needed to the input into any future report. In addition, a protocol with the Police would be required. |
|
|
|
RESOLVED – |
|
|
|
That the officers be asked to report further on this matter including comments upon the various points raised during discussion. |
|
|
|
e) Water Meadow Car Park |
|
|||
It was noted that pre planning application discussions had commenced with a view to a planning application being made at the end of the month. The matter was noted. |
|||
|
|||
f) Tree Preservation Orders |
|||
|
|||
Members were reminded of the concern expressed at the perceived inadequate coverage and speed in processing Tree Preservation Orders. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
That this matter be referred to Scrutiny Committee for consideration and report. |
|||
|
|||
g) Special Constables and Volunteer Support for the Police |
|||
|
|||
The Chief Executive advised that Thames Valley Police were currently pursuing two initiatives which it was thought would assist with policing in the area. These were:- |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
The Council's role in the matter would be by publicity in the Chiltern Chronicle and possibly by some financial assistance. It was agreed that the officers would discuss this matter with the new Area Commander, Superintendent John Donlon. |
|||
|
|||
h) E-Government |
|||
|
|||
Members were reminded of the requirement for the Council to consider its approach to E.Government and its impact across the Community Plan. Further work was required to develop the vision, identify transactions and to indicate the scope and action planning on this matter. |
|||
|
|||
The Director of Corporate Services advised that the Government had indicated that local authorities were required to prepare to be on line with the majority of services by 2005. This requirement had financial implications and the Government had indicated recently that it may consider making grants to local authorities. In order to secure finance, it would be necessary for the Council's Integrated Electronic Government Statement to be prepared by 31 July this year. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
That the officers, in consultation with Councillor Banham, be granted delegated authority to agree the statement in time for it to be submitted by 31 July. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
29. GRANT AID SCHEME REVIEW |
|||
|
|||
It was noted that this matter was a key decision and was contained within the Forward Plan. |
|||
|
|||
Members were reminded that the Policy and Finance Committee had identified the grant aid scheme as one requiring review during 2001/2002. The report before the Executive outlined the current practices and indicated the research with other councils and the benchmark club which had been undertaken. |
|||
|
|||
The key objectives of the scheme were outlined and the suggestion that the grant aid policy should further the key objectives of the Community Plan was accepted. |
|||
|
|||
The previous separate grant aid funds covering sports, community, arts, meals for elderly, environment and one-off grants were noted together with the suggestion that one grant aid fund should be operated to incorporate all the various types of grants. The result of such a policy would mean that the advisory bodies whose recommendations had in the past generally been accepted, would play a role in a proposed new forum for communication rather than making direct recommendations. |
|||
|
|||
Recognition was given to the need for this Council to monitor the effectiveness of the grants which had been made and to require the recipients to report back after the grant had been taken up and used. |
|||
|
|||
The suggestion in the officers' report was for grant applications to be considered by the Executive five times per year. During discussion, Members felt that this number of meetings was too frequent and that a lesser number of reports, possibly three, would be more effective. |
|||
|
|||
The Director of Planning and the Environment reminded the Executive that no grants had been made so far this year pending this report. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
5. That all monitoring and evaluation linking directly to criteria be undertaken. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
9. That the current officer delegations for grants awards of £250 remain. |
|||
|
|||
10. That the current practice of offering loans instead of or as well as a grant be discontinued. |
|||
|
|||
|
30. CONTAMINATED LAND REPORT |
|
|
|
The report of the officers provided information on the progress on the new duties imposed on local authorities in respect of contaminated land. It identified the likely implications and recommended the approval of the draft contaminated land strategy for consultation purposes. The matter outlined was a key decision and was contained within the Forward Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
And |
|
|
|
RESOLVED – |
|
|
|
That the Director of Planning and the Environment, in consultation with the portfolio holder for Environmental Management, be authorised to make any minor changes to the strategy arising from comments made by consultees. |
|
|
|
|
|
31. ANNUAL HOUSING REPORTS |
|
|
|
The Executive considered the annual housing needs report and review and the private sector housing renewal report. The annual housing needs report review was a key decision and the private sector housing renewal report was an annual update becoming a key decision because some changes to policy were required. |
|
|
|
In response to Members' questions, the officers outlined the "notional increase in rent following the works being undertaken." |
|
|
|
RESOLVED – |
|
|
|
That the draft of the Chiltern District Council annual housing needs report and review be approved. |
|
|
|
And |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32. ANNUAL FOOD REVIEW |
|
|
|
The Executive had before it the Annual Food Review. It was noted that this matter was outside the Policy framework. The purpose of the report was to seek approval to proposed revisions to the Food Policy; to seek approval for the Food Service Business Plan; to present the Annual Report for Food Safety for 2000/2001 including food hygiene inspections, complaints, legislation changes and other food activities and to confirm targets for the current year. The matter was a key decision and referred to in the Forward Plan. |
|
|
Members were advised of the further guidance from the Foods Standard Agency and the revised code of practice which required the sampling policy to be amended. Information on monitoring of water quality, particularly at high risk facilities, was outlined. |
|
|
|
A detailed outline of the Annual Report 2000/2001 was made. Members commented upon the achievement of inspecting 99% of food hygiene inspections against the target of 95%. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
33. FINANCIAL RESULTS 2000/2001 |
|||
|
|||
The Director of Corporate Services advised that the accounts for 2000/2001 had now been closed subject to external audit. The Council's auditors would report the results of their audit to the December meeting of the Executive. |
|||
|
|||
Information on the revenue results of 2000/2001, the collection fund and the consolidated balance sheet were given. There were no specific matters to which the Executive's attention were drawn and the general position was felt to be satisfactory. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
That the revenue financial results for 2000/2001, the collection fund and the consolidated balance sheet position as at 31 March 2001 be noted. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
34. REPAIRS AND RENEWALS FUND – 2000/2001 OUTTURN |
|||
|
|||
Members had before them an appendix outlining the repairs and renewals fund outturn figures. The figures were still subject to audit by the Council's external auditors. Four schemes were to be carried forward into the current financial year. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
1. That the repairs and renewals fund outturn for 2000/2001 be noted. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
35. HOUSING BENEFIT – DISCRETIONARY HOUSING PAYMENTS |
|||
|
|||
The report advised that under the housing and council tax benefits schemes, the Council had a discretion to make additional payments of benefit in cases of exceptional circumstances or exceptional hardship. The discretion had been exercised by the Director of Corporate Services in the first instance with appeal to the Benefits Review Board. |
|||
|
|||
The Members were reminded that the existing arrangements for exceptional circumstances and exceptional hardship had been ended. |
|||
|
|||
A new scheme of discretionary housing payments had now been introduced which was not subject to appeal to the new Appeals Tribunal and arrangements had to be made for any such cases to be reviewed. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
2. That the Council's Constitution be amended accordingly. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
36. DELEGATIONS – REVISED SCHEME FOR HEALTH AND HOUSING |
|||
|
|||
The new Council Constitution included an adopted scheme of delegations to officers. This scheme did not included revised delegations in relation to the Head of Health and Housing which were now before the Executive for consideration. Members noted that the revised delegations indicated whether the function was in respect of that exercised by the Council or by the Executive. The Executive had the power to authorise delegations under its respective functions but the Council delegations would need to receive full Council approval. |
|
|
RESOLVED – |
|
|
|
That approval be given to the revised delegations to the Head of Health and Housing insofar as it relates to the delegation of an Executive function. Such revised delegations to be effective from 1 August 2001. |
|
|
|
And |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
37. COMMUNITY SAFETY INITIATIVES – ADDITIONAL FUNDING |
|||
|
|||
The officer's report asked Members to consider making potential bids for two additional sources of funding available to Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships for the next three years. The proposal was a key decision affecting the whole District and was included in the Forward Plan. |
|||
|
|||
Members were advised that the Government Office for the South East had indicated two additional sources of funding available for Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships for the next three years. Chiltern CDRP was being offered £80,100 per year for an initiative entitled "Communities against Drugs". A further sum of £25,858 was being offered to strengthen the work of the partnership. |
|||
|
|||
It was suggested that a substantial amount of the funds on offer could be pooled within the Chiltern Vale Police area to support a specialist anti-drug police team. |
|||
|
|||
In response to questions, Members were assured that the remainder of the funding would be used to increase awareness of drugs where appropriate, including supporting Youth Council initiatives on drug awareness. Members also expressed the wish that tangible evidence of the effectiveness of this policy should be given. |
|||
|
|||
The partnership development funding was to assist in developing skills and competency of community safety staff. The increase in the work content of crime and disorder within the Council was recognised. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
38. A413 AYLESBURY ROAD, GREAT MISSENDEN – ACCIDENT REMEDIAL SCHEME |
|||
|
|||
The officers reported on a consultation which had been received from Buckinghamshire County Council on a proposed accident remedial scheme at the A413 junction Aylesbury Road, Great Missenden. The scheme involved installation of lighting columns, an extension of road hatching and replacement of road signs. |
|||
|
|||
Members felt that a more radical solution to this dangerous junction should be undertaken including the possibility that the junction should be closed either wholly or on entry from the A413. The Council's officers felt that the County Council scheme could be improved by adjusting the junction's layout to improve visibility. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
Buckinghamshire County Council had resolved to make a definitive map modification order to add the footpath from Hawridge Court to its junction with public footpath number 31 Cholesbury-cum-St Leonards to the definitive map as a public footpath. The background to the application was given. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
That the proposal be supported. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
The Executive was advised that notice had been received from Buckinghamshire County Council that it had resolved to make a definitive map modification order to add a path through Chantry Wood as a public footpath. Comment from the District Council Member for Austenwood was reported and a Member of the Executive also reported on his personal knowledge of the site. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
That the proposal be supported. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
41. JOINT MEETING – CHILTERN AVENUE AND SYCAMORE ROAD, AMERSHAM |
|||
|
|||
The notes of a joint meeting held on 12 June 2001 between officers and Members of Buckinghamshire County Council and this Council was reported and noted. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
42. SELECTED LIST OF TENDERERS FOR THE SUPPLY OF GIS |
|||
|
|||
The Executive was requested to agree a select list of tenderers for the supply of a geographic information system. Based on the criteria which had been put forward for the supply of the system, nine tenderers were found suitable. The Constitution indicated that a maximum of eight tenderers were required. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
That the nine companies listed in the officer's report be invited to submit a tender for the supply of a geographic information system. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
43. COMMON LAND AT PUERS GREEN, CHALFONT ST GILES – CHALFONT ST GILES PARISH COUNCIL |
|||
|
|||
The Executive was requested to consider an application from Chalfont St Giles Parish Council for a contribution of up to £500 towards the costs of seeking independent advice on the status of a strip of registered land at Puers Green, Chalfont St Giles which it currently maintained. |
|||
|
|||
The history of this matter was outlined and Members were reminded that a sum of £1,000 had been contributed towards the County Council's costs of taking legal action against the person encroaching on the registered common. The litigation had been discontinued following advice from an expert engaged by the County Council that the land was highway waste rather than common land. The Parish Council now wished to take a second opinion on this advice and had requested the Council to make a contribution. The County Council had already agreed to contribute towards further research and advice. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
44. SCRUTINY COMMITTEE – SUBJECTS FOR CONSIDERATION |
|||
|
|||
The Leader of the Executive indicated matters which he felt would make suitable subjects for the Scrutiny Committee to consider. These were:- |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
This matter was noted. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
45. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
That under section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part I of Schedule 12A of the Act. |
|||
|
|||
Note: The relevant paragraph numbers from Part I of Schedule 12A are indicated at the end of the Minute headings. |
|||
|
|||
|
46. RAANS PLAYING FIELDS, RAANS ROAD, AMERSHAM (Paragraphs 8 and 9) |
|||
|
|||
The Executive was advised that Buckinghamshire County Council had written to ask whether this Council would be interested in purchasing 2.25 hectares of the former Raans School playing field, Raans Road, Amersham. The playing fields had been declared surplus by the County Council's Education Committee. |
|||
|
|||
Information on the planning situation was indicated, including consideration of the first local plan enquiry into the Chiltern Local Plan in 1991. |
|||
|
|||
The disadvantages of acquiring the site including maintenance and repairs was outlined and information on the possible attitude of the Sport England was given. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
47. CHESHAM TOWN CENTRE (Paragraph 9) |
|||
|
|||
The finalisation of fees and details of the Town Centre Redevelopment were given. The matter had last been considered by Policy and Finance Committee in October 1998 (Minute 95 refers). |
|||
|
|||
The Council's solicitors had written indicating that a number of matters still required to be resolved and these were matters which could be undertaken by the Council's in house legal team. Provision for payment of legal fees and for some outstanding legal work would still be required. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
That provision of £20,000 be made from the existing funds held on account for payment of solicitor's fees and any residual work. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
(Paragraph 7) |
|||
|
|||
An application on behalf of the Chiltern Hundreds Housing Association in respect of premises at White Hill Chesham and Hundreds House Amersham were reported. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
That in view of the fact that the premises are used for administrative purposes, not specifically for the direct benefit of the community, no discretionary rate relief be awarded. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
49. COUNCIL TAX AND NON DOMESTIC RATES – ARREARS FOR WRITE OFF (Paragraph 7) |
|||
|
|||
Consideration was given to a case where debts were irrecoverable. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED – |
|||
|
|||
That approval be given to write off the debts indicated below: |
|||
Mr L B R Davies, 24 Kings Road, Chalfont St Giles period 1.4.96 to 31.3.99 - £2,058.59 bankruptcy. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
50. NEXT MEETING |
|||
|
|||
Noted that two Members of the Executive would be on holiday on 7 August which was the next scheduled meeting. Following discussion, it was agreed to adhere to this date. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
The Meeting ended at 2.40 pm |