Meeting documents

Info Sheets - Economic Improvement & Scrutiny 2004, 4-2004 Local Suppliers Initiative (Local Procurement Strategy)

 

 

 

     INFORMATION SHEET

Economic Improvement & Scrutiny Committee

Issue No: 4/2004

Date Issued: 17 June 2004

Local Suppliers Initiative (Local Procurement Strategy)

Officer contact: Angela Sives, Procurement Manager and Gareth Ralphs, Head of Business Development & Regeneration

 

Background and Best Practice Guidance

Following reports to the Economic Improvement and Scrutiny Committee Officers are developing proposals for a local procurement strategy.  This work is being progressed in light of the National Procurement Strategy proposals, the findings of the Economic Regeneration Best Value Review and best practice guidance from the CEDOS ‘Local Government procurement: an economic development action guide’ (outlined further below).  

Our work is currently positioning Wycombe as one of the leading District Council’s in developing a local suppliers initiative in response to the National Procurement Strategy.

Meeting Corporate Objectives

The project contributes to the requirements of the National Procurement Strategy, which have been set out in response to the Byatt Report.  More specifically the Strategy states that Councils should (a) take steps to ensure a diverse and competitive supply base, including procurement from small firms, ethnic minority businesses, social enterprises and voluntary and community organisations, and; (b) achieve community benefits as set out in the Community Plan through procurement.

The project also supports the following Economic Regeneration Best Value Review service priorities: (1) achieving greater engagement with local businesses & stakeholders; (2) increasing income into the District, and; (3) developing a sound knowledge-base of the local economy.

Progress to Date (Phase I)

Phase I of developing a Local Suppliers Initiative has recently been completed using industry consultants to assist in establishing the current level of business placed by the Council with local business.  The objective was to benchmark organisations, with the objective of increasing the amount of work awarded to local business either directly or indirectly within the acceptable constraints of legality.  The headline findings of this work are summarised below:

In March 2004 the Procurement Unit, in conjunction with Economic Development Unit, commissioned a survey to analyse the Council’s spend, and in particular to identify how much of this spend was ‘local’   The results of this research will be used to identify:

 

·

How the Council might engage more with local suppliers

·

set targets for increasing local spend, and

·

opportunities for collaboration with neighbouring authorities to consolidate spend with local suppliers.

The research analysed the Council’s spending pattern with all its suppliers for the year 2003.  Key indicators for this spend are:

·

Total ‘non-pay’ expenditure i.e. Goods, Services and Works     £31,344,129

·

Total number of all suppliers     1,830

The data was refined to exclude suppliers with <£1,000 spend for the year, non-trade suppliers (i.e. bodies not registered as companies such as local authorities, charities and voluntary organisations) and unclassifieds (ie. companies not registered).  The final study, therefore, analysed 716 suppliers relating to £26.9m spend which ensured a full representation of Council spend.  The key findings were that the:

% of WDC spend with local suppliers in 2003:     20%     (£5.3m)

% of local spend with SME’s     42%     £2.3m

WDC top spend classification      Construction     £8.4m

Local spend was also analysed by wards.  The top three are shown here for reference:

 

Ward

% Spend

Value spend

Greater Marlow

48.33%

£2.57m

Abbey

25.73%

£1.37m

Oakridge & Castlefield

8.08%

£0.430m

 

A more detailed summary of results of the research is provided in the attachment to this information sheet.  

Future Work

Following the initial research outlined above, proposals are being developed to establish the terms of reference for a WDC Local Supplier Initiative.   The Initiative will include proposals to:

By 2004,

·

Engage more with local businesses by gaining a better understanding of local suppliers, market opportunities to do business with the Council, and set targets for increasing business with local suppliers.

·

Publish a ‘Selling to the Council’ guide on the website together with details of bidding opportunities and contact details for each appropriate contract.  

·

Commence a pilot to assist local bidders to develop their track record in achieving value for money through effective use of their supply chain, including the use of small firms.  The pilot would initially work with a number of small, medium and large businesses in targeted business sectors, such as Housing.  

·

Enhance the compact with the local voluntary and community sector to include local procurement and promote the opportunities of creating social enterprises.

 

And by 2005,

·

Implement an e-Procurement solution for businesses (working with those pilot firms outlined above).

·

Develop the requirement that places a commitment on all bidders to submit optional, priced proposals for the delivery of specified community benefits, relevant to the contract and/or adding value to the Community Plan.

The Next Steps

For the Officer contacts leading this project to prepare a more detailed report outlining the terms of reference of a Wycombe District Local Supplier Initiative Strategy and submit this for Cabinet consideration in September 2004.  

LOCAL SUPPLIERS INITIATIVE

SUMMARY RESULTS OF RESEARCH

The total number of suppliers included in the review was 716 out of a potential 1,830 used in the period January-December 2003.  This corresponds to a total spend of £26.9m.  This spend is classified as ‘non-pay’ expenditure ie. spend in relation to supplies, services and works.

1.

Data Analysed:

The final number of suppliers included in the research was refined as follows:

 

 

No Suppliers

Revised total

Initial data provided

1,830

 

Duplicate records (eg. same company, different name)

73

1,757

Records not matched (“unclassifieds”)

224

1,533

Suppliers <£1,000 spend pa

656

877

Non-trade suppliers (eg. LA’s, housing assoc, charities, voluntary sector)

161

716

Total no. WDC suppliers analysed

 

716

                

2.     WDC Top suppliers by Spend:

 

Supplier Name

Location (based on payment address)*

Contract

Total Spend in 2003

Mears Building

Blackpool

Housing Repairs 

£3,233,904

Onyx UK Ltd

High Wycombe

Refuse & Recycling 

£2,216,758

Verdant

Westham, East Sussex

Street Cleansing 

£1.0m

 

 

Grounds Maint.  

£0.83m

ITNet

London, W5

IT Service 

£1.0m

Sodexho

High Wycombe

Grounds Maintenance

£1.0m

Dorwin Ltd

Oldham, Lancs

Replacement windows

£0.8m

J P Barrett & Sons

Southgate, London

Kitchen & Bathroom Refurbs

£0.53m

Wycombe Arts Management

London, EC4

Wycombe Swan Management

£0.46m

Wragge & Co.

High Wycombe

Legal Advice

£0.46m

Anglian Windows Ltd

High Wycombe

Replacement Windows

£0.40m

Total Spend – Top 10 suppliers

 

 

£11.8m

NB.  Whilst a number of the Council’s suppliers have offices in High Wycombe, for the purposes of this research the payment address was used to identify ‘location’ by postcode.

3.

Spend Type:

The distribution of spend and suppliers by classification was analysed for two different classification systems – SIC codes and Thomson Directory:

3.1

Supplier & Spend Distribution by Industry (ie. SIC codes)

 

Industry Classification

WDC Spend

No. WDC Suppliers

Construction

£8.4m

98

Business Services (IT, Legal)

£5.9m

257

Other Community, Social & Personal Services (Waste Management, recycling)

£5.3m

46

Manufacturing (inc. electricity)

£2.6m

138

Wholsesale & Retail Trades (trade suppliers)

£1.9m

105

Agriculture (grounds maintenance, gardens)

£1.0m

9

Transport, Storage & Communication

£0.9m

34

Financial Services (Insurances)

£0.8m

18

Hotels & Restaurants (inc. B&B’s)

£0.06m

11

Total

£26.86m

716

 

3.2     Supplier & Spend Distribution by Directory (ie. Thomson classifications)

 

Directory Classification

WDC Spend

No. WDC Suppliers

Waste Disposal Services

£4.5m

7

Property Maint. & Repairs

£3.76m

4

Computer Systems & Software

£2.2m

33

Builders

£1.9m

15

Landscape Contractors

£1.1m

2

Solicitors

£0.6m

7

All Other Categories

£12.8m

648

Total

£26.9m

716

 

4.

WDC Supplier Location

 

 

No. Suppliers

Value of Spend

% Value

Wycombe

107

£5.3m

19.79

Rest of UK

609

£21.6m

80.21

 

5.

WDC Supplier location by Local Authorities:

 

Wycombe DC    

19.79%

Aylesbury Vale DC

1.97%

Birmingham MBC    

6.9%

Sevenoaks    

7.07%

East Hampshire DC    

3.09%

Salford MBC    

3.9%

Vale of White Horse DC    

2.46%

Gloucester

12.49%

Reading DC    

1.68%

West Berkshire DC

1.56%

All Other Authorities    

39.09%

 

 

6.     WDC supplier location by South East region (£19.633m)

 

Wycombe DC    

40.17%

Aylesbury Vale DC    

3.83%

South Oxfordshire DC

2.71%

South Bucks DC         

0.82%

Chiltern DC    

2.65%

Slough BC         

0.81

All Other Authorities    

49.0%

 

 

7.     WDC Spend distribution by local Wards:

 

Ward

% Spend

Value spend

Top 2 suppliers

Greater Marlow

48.33%

£2.57m

Onyx, R & D Contractors

Abbey

25.73%

£1.37m

Wycombe Arts Mngt, I L Beeks

Oakridge & Castlefields

8.08%

£0.430m

Quality Heating Serv, Portcullis & Co.

Sands

7.29%

£0.390m

TVM Ltd, Boyce Bus. Equip

The Wooburns

3.72%

£0.200

Scalable Networks, Allen Roofing

Bourne End-cum-Hedsor

1.83%

£0.100

Chiltern Lifts, Xerox

Marlow South East

0.92%

£0.050

Clear Drains, HAP

Greater Hughenden

0.83%

£0.044

Indus. Pipe Serv, Lay Construction

Terriers & Amersham Hill

0.69%

£0.037

R & M Electrical, HAP

Icknield

0.45%

£0.024

A V Transport, Briants of Risboro

All other local wards

2.13%

£0.113

C Dowdy, Brocklehurst Arch.

Total Spend by local wards

 

£5.328m

 

8.

WDC Suppliers by Size:

 

 

No. Suppliers

% Spend

Value of Spend

Local Spend

SMEs    

473

52.29

£14.05

£2.229m

Enterprise

102

47.71

£12.8m

£2.925m

 

Research carried out by Spikes Cavell & Co., 5 April 2004