Meeting documents
Document: | 2001-09-11 CABINET |
PRESENT: Councillor Mrs Morgan-Owen (in the Chair); Councillors Ashenden, James, Liverseidge, Mrs Paternoster, Mrs Polhill, Rowlands, Sir Beville Stanier and Stewart. Councillors Baldwin, Cole, Mrs Glover, Isham, Mrs Lambert, Metherell and Richards attended also. |
|||
APOLOGIES: Councillors Cartwright and James. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
That the Minutes of 28th August, 2001 be approved as a correct record. |
|||
|
|||
Cabinet received a report, also to be considered by full Council on 12th September, 2001, which sought to address the financial and environmental implications of travellers' encampments within the Vale. The report also sought to identify whether or not there were any trends in the numbers of encampments and gave details of the actions taken by the Council to prevent unauthorised encampments, and the possible future steps that might be taken to deal with this issue. |
|||
The report outlined the existing legislative framework and pointed out that the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) had commissioned a review of the current legislation. It was anticipated that the review conclusions would be published in late September. Inspector Downing of Thames Valley Police (Aylesbury area) and Mr T Holland, the County Council's Gypsy Officer attended and responded to questions from Cabinet Members and other Members present at the meeting. |
|||
Reference was made also to an additional site, namely Bedgrove Park, where preventative measures might need to be taken. The cost benefit analysis referred to in the decision below would include this site also. |
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
A report outlining a possible scheme designed to help current and former tenants who were experiencing difficulty clearing rent arrears was withdrawn following recent discussion with the Tenants Panel which had highlighted the need for additional information. Following these discussions, the proposed scheme would be refined and further consultation would take place with the Panel |
|||
|
|||
Approval was sought to the matching transfer of land between Housing and General Fund and vice-versa. This would enable management and disposal of both areas of land to be dealt with within the most appropriate portfolio, recognising the expected end use. |
|||
The Head of Finance explained that the proposed appropriation would enable the land at Bearbrook House to form the Council's investment in a wider development which would include affordable housing, thus securing £1M worth of input rather than having a cash sum which would be reduced by the debt redemption requirements. |
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Consideration was given to a report suggesting a means whereby the Jubilee might suitably be marked throughout the District. The proposal was designed to accord with the Council's approved budgetary processes, ensure equitable distribution of the funds that might be made available and to encourage the promotion of schemes which could be regarded as being sustainable development. |
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
That the Council, in due course be asked to |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|