Meeting documents
Document: | 2001-12-18 CABINET |
PRESENT: Councillor Mrs Morgan-Owen (in the Chair); Councillors Ashenden, James, Liverseidge, Mrs Paternoster, Mrs Polhill, Rowlands, Sir Beville Stanier and Stewart. Councillors Baldwin, Mrs Baxter, Mrs Brandis, Cole, Mrs Glover, Isham, Mrs Jamieson, Kennell, Mrs Lambert, Metherell, Miss Reynolds, Richards and Searle attended also. |
|||
APOLOGY: Councillor Cartwright. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
That the Minutes of 4th December, 2001 be approved as a correct record subject to the inclusion of Councillor Ashenden in the list of Members present. |
|||
|
|||
Earlier reports had highlighted the issues facing the Council in formulating the budget for 2002/2003. Following the Cabinet's discussions on 6th November and 4th December, the scrutiny process had started. The previous reports had indicated that there were still a number of uncertainties. However, these were becoming clearer and the report now before Members sought to clarify the position on a number of budgetary issues. The report had been structured in such a way as to give Cabinet an opportunity to determine initial proposals for the budget and Council Tax, which would be fed into the scrutiny process. |
|||
The provisional grant settlement had been reported to the last meeting. The settlement suggested a grant of £2.384M and a business rate distribution figure of £6.771M. The combined income for 2002/2003 was now projected to be £9.155M which was only £70,000 (0.75%) higher than the current year. Earlier projections had assumed a 3% cash increase. Discussions were continuing with DETLR officials regarding this Council's settlement and there was a possibility that this might change. |
|||
As previously reported, the triennial revaluation of the Superannuation Fund now confirmed an increase in employer contributions by some £900,000 per annum. The latest report outlined the options open to the Council for phasing the increase thus spreading the impact over a longer period. |
|||
The Council Tax Base for 2002/2003 showed an increase of 0.8% compared to the 1% growth built into the original projections. The staff pay award negotiations were continuing, but the report used the latest employer's offer of a 2.1% increase for budgetary planning purposes. The audit of the Benefit Subsidy Claim had been completed and would result in an estimated £300,000 being transferred back into revenue balances. This would improve options for the application of balances. The 2001/2002 budget outturn now suggested an overspend of £82,000 rather than £157,000 identified in previous projections. |
|||
Members were reminded of the budget pressures and savings options identified in the earlier report, and of the current position regarding General Fund Net Expenditure proposals and the current policy for the use of revenue balances over the medium term |
|||
The Cabinet was required to finalise proposals for 2002/2003, which after scrutiny, would be submitted to full Council on 13th February, 2002. A range of Council Tax options had been prepared on the basis of the information currently available. The options contained in the report assumed that all the current proposals relating to savings and income generation would be delivered. The report also sought to clarify the position regarding Council Tax capping and future years' budget projections. |
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
That subject to reconsideration following the scrutiny process the Council be recommended to approve:- |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
When the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) position had been considered on 20th November, certain information had not been available at that time. Significantly, this had included the Government Subsidy determination and rent proposals for 2002/2003. |
|||
The Cabinet was informed that the above mentioned information was now available and this had necessitated a review of the position on the HRA for 2002/2003. Based upon the information available at the last meeting, it had been agreed to recommend a rent increase of 5.7%. This would maintain repairs and maintenance expenditure at current levels and would result in working balances of £420,000 which was £30,000 higher than the identified minimum recommended level. |
|||
Since the meeting on 20th November, the position had been re-examined in the light of the latest information. The changes could be summarised as follows:- |
|||
|
|
|
|
With the previously recommended increase of 5.7%, the Council would have an average rent of £55.12, which was just below the Government's target. In order to match the Government's target level, rents would have to be increased by 6%. This would limit the pressure for large rent restructuring in future years, although it would not remove entirely the need for increases because of the upwards pressure on costs. |
|
The alternative to increasing rents was to reduce repairs expenditure by £73,000. The options available to the Council could be summarised as follows:- |
|
|
|
|
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
That subject to any views the Scrutiny Committee – Housing might have, the following changes to the recommendations made by the Cabinet at the meeting on 20th November, 2001, be approved:- |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
The Cabinet considered the report of the Director of Planning, Property and Construction Services regarding the options for marketing the Walton Street site. The report outlined the key issues that needed to be addressed in relation to the disposal of the site and contained a timescale for the sale process. Each of the options included in the report had an accompanying commentary on its relative advantages and disadvantages. |
|||
An indicative timetable for each stage of the process was given as follows:- |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
The Cabinet received the report of the Director of Planning, Property and Construction Services regarding the programme for carrying out these works. An oral report was given on discussions held with Buckingham Town Council as a result of which a further report would be submitted to the Cabinet. Having acknowledged the high degree of professionalism shown by the Officers during their discussions with the Town Council, it was |
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
The report of the Independent Panel on Members' Allowances had identified the need to review Member Support Services. The review had subsequently been undertaken by the Cabinet Member for Customer Services, assisted by his Policy Advisors, namely Councillors Cole and Mrs Payne. All Members of the Council had been given the opportunity to comment on existing services and three sessions had been held to show Members the new accommodation at Exchange Street. The report of the Chief Executive incorporated the main findings of the questionnaire survey. Having commented on the issue of business cards and envelopes and the possible introduction of a flat rate mileage allowance, it was |
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
That the following issues be considered as part of the review of the new political management arrangements:- |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
That the training needs identified during the review be progressed by the Cabinet Member for Personnel and Support Services and the Training and Development Officer. |
|||
|
|||
That the question of the Development Control and Licensing Committees having some form of direct responsibility to Council be considered as part of the review of the political management arrangements. |
|||
|
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
That under Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act, 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in the Paragraphs indicated in Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act:- |
|||
Aquavale Post Project Report. (Paragraphs 7 and 9). |
|||
Funding Regrading Requests. (Paragraph 1). |
|||
|
|||
Consideration was given to the detailed report of the Director of Planning, Property and Construction Services regarding payments made under the terms of the construction contract in excess of the approved budget, and in relation to further payments that might have to be paid, also under the terms of the contract. |
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
At the meeting on 4th December, 2001, a report had been considered regarding the future funding of staff regradings. Cabinet had indicated its intention to adopt an approach along the lines set out in detail in the Minutes of the last meeting, and which had subsequently been endorsed by full Council on 12th December, 2001. Members had asked for a further report regarding how the previous decisions might be implemented. Members noted that resources had been identified to meet the costs of the regradings of the Customer Services Officers. |
|||
RESOLVED - |
|||
|
|||
|