Agenda and minutes
Venue: The Oculus, Buckinghamshire Council, Gatehouse Road, Aylesbury HP19 8FF. View directions
Contact: Leslie Ashton
Media
Webcast: View the webcast
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies Additional documents: Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillors R Carington, A Christensen, L Clarke OBE, T Dixon, C Etholen and S Rouse.
The Chairman welcomed Councillor R Stuchbury to the Committee who had replaced Councillor Majid Hussain. |
|
Declarations of interest Additional documents: Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on 27 September 2022. Additional documents: Minutes: RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting held on 27 September 2022 be approved as a correct record. |
|
Statement of Accounts Update PDF 121 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee received an update on the 2020/21 and 2021/22 Statement of Accounts. The Committee also considered the management response to the Audit Risk Assessment attached at Appendix A to the report. Prior to discussion, the Chairman welcomed Mr Mark Stocks, Audit Partner and Ms Sheena Phillips, Audit Manager from Grant Thornton, external auditors.
The revised reconciled and completed Statement of Accounts were submitted to the auditors on 23 September 2022. Due to reduction in Gross Expenditure on the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Account (CIES) the audit materiality had decreased which had resulted in additional sample testing. The external auditors had resumed their audit from 1 November 2022. Officers were working to resolve outstanding audit queries promptly and held regular bi-weekly meetings with auditors to monitor progress. Due to additional sampling, it was anticipated that the audit would be completed in January 2023 and the final accounts for 2020/21 would be presented to the Audit and Governance Committee for approval at its February meeting.
Work continued to progress on the 2021/22 Accounts draft accounts ensuring all the issues raised by the auditor on 2020/21 accounts were addressed. However, the accounts would not be finalised until the audit for 2020/21 was completed as this could potentially have an impact on the opening figures.
The Audit Risk Assessment report covered areas of auditor risk assessment along with the management response. The Committee considered the management response to aid in fulfilling its responsibilities in relation to the financial reporting process.
Key points raised during discussion included:
|
|
Draft Pension Fund Accounts to 31st March 2022 PDF 133 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered a report which contained the draft unaudited Statement of Accounts for the Buckinghamshire Pension Fund for the year ended 31 March 2022. The Pension Fund Account and Net Asset Statement show that in the year to 31st March 2022 the value of the Pension Fund increased by £275m to £3.913bn. This was the net result of the contributions made (£169m) including transfers in from other pension schemes, employers’ and employees’ contributions; payments out £144m including pensions, commutations, lump sum retirement benefit and death benefits; management expenses £17m plus net returns on investments (£267m). The accounts had been prepared in accordance with proper practices as set out in the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the United Kingdom 2021/22.
The external audit of the pension fund draft accounts 2021/22 would commence shortly. A further report, incorporating the findings of Grant Thornton would be brought to this Committee at a future meeting where representatives from Grant Thornton would be in attendance.
Key points raised during discussion included:
RESOLVED: That the Committee reviewed the Draft Statement of Accounts for Buckinghamshire Pension Fund for the year ended 31st March 2022 and the timing and requirements for completion and ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
Treasury Management Mid-Year Update Report PDF 275 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor John Chilver, Cabinet Member for Accessible Housing and Resources attended to present to the Committee the treasury management mid-year report which detailed the treasury management activity for the first six months of the financial year. A summary of the Council’s borrowing and the treasury cash (investments) position was summarised within the report as was the budget monitoring position. Approximately £296m was held in loans, whilst circa £197m was in investments.
The report noted that in the current economic climate it was considered appropriate to keep investments short term to cover cash flow needs, but also to seek out value available in periods up to 12 months with high credit rated financial institutions.
In overall budget terms, the Council was forecast to be £2.8m net better off during the year, the increase in interest rates meant that the Council was forecast to achieve £1.884m more investment income than budgeted for. The Council was forecast to spend £8.379m on interest for external borrowing activity in the financial year, an underspend of £916k compared to the budget of £9.295m. The budget assumed that the Council would undertake new borrowing in 2022/23, to date no new borrowing had been undertaken. Another factor, however, was the continuation of the Council’s strategy to use surplus cash instead of borrowing, to reduce risks and keep external financing costs low. The Council would continue the strategy of internal borrowing while it made sense to continue to do so.
Key points raised during discussion included: · To date there had been no new borrowing in 2022/23, or indeed since the start of the unitary Council. The priorities highlighted in order within the Treasury Management Strategy were security, liquidity and then yield. · There was no prospect of early redemption of LOBO loans, although the Council would consider this if the opportunity arose. · Treasury Management loans would be covered under item 7, however in response to a query raised, the Committee was advised that in relation to the loan to Thurrock Council, assurances had been received from the Section 151 Officer at Thurrock that funds would be repaid in full as they matured in January 2023. Thurrock had made arrangements directly with the Treasury to ensure that they could satisfy cash flow requirements. · It was confirmed that the Council continued to have a low risk appetite in respect of investments and borrowing and this approach had not changed during the recent economic crisis. · It was further confirmed that the sovereign credit rating system was used by the Council when considering investing in other countries, who required a minimum AAA rating, as set out in the Treasury Management Strategy.
RESOLVED: That the Treasury Management Mid-Year Update for 2022/23 be noted. |
|
Treasury Management Loans to Other Local Authorities PDF 156 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor John Chilver, Cabinet Member for Accessible Housing and Resources presented to the Committee a report which detailed the Council’s approach to loaning funds to individual local authorities, the parameters for which were set in the Council’s Treasury Management Strategy. The report was brought before the Committee due to recent publicity around loans to other local authorities who had found themselves in financial difficulties. The Committee was advised that there was minimal risk to funds loaned to other local authorities, even those under significant pressures. There was specific protection under the Local Government Act 2003 which made clear that all loans were secured on future revenues and this included the ability to take legal action if any debts were not repaid.
Members were informed that no local authority had ever defaulted on a loan and the Council’s Treasury Management Strategy, agreed in February 2022 tightened the control procedures around new investments in local authorities who were issuing Section 114 notices or requested capitalisation directives to require approval from the Section 151 Officer and relevant Cabinet Member. No such proposals had been made this financial year and measures had been strengthened further to require approval from the Leader and Chief Executive of the Council prior to making any local authority loan. There was a Treasury Management watch list held which included authorities who had requested capitalisation directives or where commissioners had been appointed regardless of any formal notices or directives.
The Treasury Management Strategy 2023/24 would be updated to reflect the actions from the 27th September Audit and Governance Committee meeting and would be presented to the Committee at its meeting on 1 February 2023.
During discussion, key points raised included:
· The Treasury Management watch list was kept under regular review and local authorities were added as necessary. Members were reminded that a previous investment in Slough Borough Council, who had issued an S114 notice was recovered in full on time. The thorough due diligence review that the Council would now undertake before a local authority loan was made would complement the watch list and act as an additional measure before making a decision on whether to add an authority to the watch list. · The Council’s Treasury Management Advisors advice was still for Local Authorities to be continued with as a counterpart investment option. Members were assured that there was every confidence Thurrock would repay their loan when it matured in January, as noted in the minute for the previous item. · A question was raised around whether the Council was made aware what the investment would be used for by the borrowing Local Authority. The Committee was advised that the Council would not take account of what the funds would be used for when making a decision, and would focus on ensuring the overall financial standing of that local authority was satisfactory. · The Committee raised concern that there was a reputation risk to the Council in lending to authorities who ultimately issued Section 114 notices or found themselves in ... view the full minutes text for item 7. |
|
Annual Governance Statement PDF 111 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee considered a revised draft Annual Governance Statement (AGS) for 2021/22. This was the second AGS for Buckinghamshire Council and related to the second year of the Council’s operation as a unitary authority. Recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic was a key feature of the year. The Committee made some initial comments on the earlier draft at its meeting in September 2022. This revision incorporated the amendments suggested by members of the Committee at the last meeting and since. In particular, the Committee felt that OFSTED’s SEND inspection (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) should be reflected in the AGS and its associated action plan for 2022/23. This had been done.
The Statement now also included the following as raised by members of the Committee: a) ‘COVID-19’ – standardised reference to this throughout b) Risk Management Group – importance of the challenge made to directors on acceptable risk levels, page 2 and 15 c) The learning of lessons generally and also from other authorities’ experience - page 2 and 16 d) Council – role in approval of ‘budget and policy framework’, page 6 e) Deputy Cabinet Members – role in support of Cabinet, page 6 f) Audit & Governance Committee – attendance by the Council’s statutory Section 151 Officer (current Service Director of Finance), page 6 g) Select committees – more detail on their coverage and contribution, page 6 h) Community Boards and High Wycombe Town Committee - roles, page 7 i) Internal and External Audit – reflect their counter-fraud role, page 8 j) General Data Protection Regulation – GDPR policy to be referenced, page 10 k) Induction for members – include reference to ICT training on data security, page 10 l) Constitutional change – emphasise dual role of this Committee and the Standards & General Purposes Committee, page 10 m) Election petition – correct the previous reference by referring to “the Totteridge & Bowderdean Ward”, page 11 n) Community Board experience – highlight that the ‘rapid review’ also included engagement with unparished communities, page 12 o) Community Board experience – reflect that a range of stakeholder views across parished and unparished areas were sought on their experience of community boards, page 12 p) SEND Inspection – clear articulation of the SEND Inspection, page 12-13; and inclusion of it in the Action Plan for 2022/23, page 18 q) Refugee support – include reference to Ukrainian refugees in addition to support for Afghan refugees, page 13
A Member welcomed the inclusion of the reference to the SEND inspection, noting that much of the action required was not only the Council’s responsibility but also the responsibility of key partner organisations.
RESOLVED: That the Annual Governance Statement 2021/22 be approved. |
|
Business Assurance Structure Update PDF 120 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee received a report which provided an update on and attached the new Business Assurance structure, following completion of the service review process. The new structure went live on 1 November 2022 and the team now reported in to the Service Director for Legal and Democratic Services, and the Head of business Assurance retains a ‘dotted line’ reporting arrangement to the S151 Officer. CIPFA highlighted a number of considerations which had been taken in to account as part of the service review.
During discussion, key points raised included: · There were a number of vacancies within the structure, for which there had been a good number of applicants, with interviews due to take place in the coming weeks. It was hoped that by the next meeting of the Committee in February, an update on appointments would be available. All roles were advertised internally, with some advertised externally as well and the more specialist posts posted in specific publications. There had been a number of internal applicants from individuals seeking promotion opportunities. · The structure was created with career progression opportunities in mind and ‘Grow your own’ was promoted with trainee and apprenticeship roles included within the structure which made for good succession planning. · Within the structure, particularly the addition of trainee and apprenticeship roles, there would be the opportunities for increased audit work to be undertaken internally, rather than relying on external providers. It was, however noted that the external resource remained a good option to use particularly for specific specialisms such as IT. · In relation to the busier periods of the year, the Committee was advised that quarter 4 tended to be the pinch point when a number of key financial system audits were undertaken, although these were planned well in advance. It was hoped that the new structure would help alleviate the risks at this time of year. · The Committee was advised that the manager posts also involved day to day work tasks, this went right up to the Chief Auditor post dependant on the complexity and sensitivity of the work required. · A Member noted that the CIPFA review had raised the need to meet demand for information and data auditing, and the Committee was advised that the team would be using a system called Ideal moving forward which would involve training and the building up of skills within the team. Data and information governance were noted as key areas across the whole of the organisation. · A further risk highlighted by CIPFA was the reliance on the Head of Audit and Audit Manager roles which was hopefully mitigated through the addition of the Deputy Chief Auditor post and Audit and Fraud Lead posts. The Committee congratulated Selina Harlock on her appointment to the Deputy Chief Auditor role. · A Member noted that the statement on page 141 of the reports pack should read ‘The Business Assurance Team vision is to be a…’ rather than ‘The Business Assurance Team vision is be a…’. The Member also suggested that the vision statements ... view the full minutes text for item 9. |
|
Risk Management Group Update PDF 142 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee received a report which provided an update on the Risk Management Group (RMG) meeting held on 7 November 2022. At that meeting the Group reviewed and commented on the Adults and Health directorate risk registers, the key risk themes of which were noted within the report. The Group also reviewed the external audit carried out by Mazars in respect of the southern waste round re-organisation. It was agreed that an update on progress against actions would be presented to the RMG in March 2023.
RESOLVED: That the report be noted. |
|
2022/23 Business Assurance Strategy Update (incl. Internal Audit Plan) PDF 126 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered a report which outlined the Internal Audit, Risk Management, Assurance and Counter Fraud work being undertaken by the Business Assurance Team for the year ending 31 March 2023. The Council continued to work towards a combined assurance model, with Internal Audit operating as the third line of assurance. The 2022/23 Internal Audit, Risk Management, Assurance and Counter Fraud work plans were produced with reference to the strategic and directorate risk registers; and informed through discussion with Senior Leadership Teams for each directorate.
During discussion, key points highlighted included: · An additional audit on ‘Social Care – Placement and Panel decisions’ had been included on the audit plan following a request from the relevant Corporate Director for this area of work. · Within Resources, the ‘Teachers Pensions – new system in place’ audit had been deferred to 2023/24 because of the new system being implemented. Processes and controls would be reviewed as the new system went live. · The Chairman referred to paragraph 3.2 on page 157 of the reports pack and explained that more emphasis was needed on major change projects and the need to escalate them in terms of risk as they took place. It had become apparent that in a number of circumstances, a particular service had reviewed its risk ahead of certain projects, however had not taken in to account that the risk elevated during the time the project was rolled out. · In terms of the Community Boards audit, noted on page 164 of the reports pack as ‘fieldwork in-progress’, the Chairman highlighted that the Constitution Working Group had been considering Community Boards, their governance and how they fit in to the Constitution. Should the audit identify any areas that should feed in to the Constitution the Chairman suggested they relay this to the Service Director for Democratic and Legal Services. · The Chairman highlighted that there had been some flexibility given to services moving the timing of certain audits in the early years of the unitary authority, although the Committee’s position was now clear that Council services must be audited at the right time rather than at the time which was convenient to the service. It was noted that on occasion, internal auditors could help design processes for certain departments as part of the audit process. · A Member raised concern around a number of the Social Care audits that had yet to start and was advised that it was the audit work that had not yet started, as this was planned across the year, rather than the work by the service itself. It was confirmed that the relevant Corporate and Service Directors had been liaised with and accepted the need for the audits. The timing had been agreed for the SEND Ofsted Improvement Plan Assurance audit later in the year to give the opportunity for the service to implement their improvement plan following the Ofsted inspection. The outcome of the audit would be reported back to the Committee in the usual manner within the completed audits within ... view the full minutes text for item 11. |
|
Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee noted that the 2020/21 Statement of Accounts should be ready for the meeting on 1 February, the annual Business Continuity Management Update and Risk and Business Continuity Management Strategy would also be presented to that meeting, along with a number of other policies and the Contract Procedure Rules – waivers and breaches as noted on the work programme.
The Treasury Management Strategy 23/24 would also be presented in February as would the Pension Fund Accounts 21/22 if available. The Chief Auditor would liaise with the Director of Legal and Democratic Services to establish when best to bring an report on updates to the Constitution. ACTION: Chief Auditor to add Constitution update to the work programme for the most appropriate meeting.
RESOLVED: That the latest Work Programme be noted. |
|
Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered the latest action log as attached to the agenda pack and agreed that each of the actions that had been marked completed could be closed. These were: Action 2 - Treasury Management Annual Report; Action 4 – Business Assurance new team structure; and Action 7 – Treasury Management Training Session.
RESOLVED: That the action log be noted. |
|
Exclusion of the public To resolve:
that under Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in the paragraph indicated in Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act. Additional documents: Minutes: RESOLVED: That pursuant to Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of Minutes No 15, 16 and 17, on the grounds that they involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part I of Schedule 12A of the Act as defined as follows: Minute 15 – Confidential Minutes of the Audit and Governance Committee held on 27 September 2022 Minute 16 – 2022/23 Business Assurance Strategy Update: Completed Audits and Audit Actions Summary Report Minute 17 – Action Log (confidential) |
|
Confidential Minutes To approve as a correct record the confidential minutes of the meeting held on 27 September 2022. Minutes: RESOLVED: That the confidential minutes of the meeting held on 27 September 2022 be approved as a correct record. |
|
2022/23 Business Assurance Strategy Update: Completed Audits and Audit Actions Summary Report Minutes: The Committee held a detailed discussion on the Summary of Completed Audits and Audit Action Tracker.
RESOLVED: That the report be noted. |
|
Action Log (confidential) Minutes: The Committee considered the confidential action log and
RESOLVED: That the current Action Log (confidential) be noted. |